Integrating neurophysiological insights into effective bird deterrence using flickering light
Honda, T.; Tominaga, H.; Shimizu, A.
Show abstract
There are few effective methods to mitigate the economic or health-related disadvantages caused by birds. Traditional countermeasures employing sound and light have been utilized for mitigating crop damage, but their efficacy is insufficient, and human-avian conflicts persist. This study explores a fundamentally different approach to resolving these conflicts. Flashing lights that alternate between red and blue are known to stimulate the human brain and can potentially cause photosensitive epilepsy in one in 100,000 people, though very rarely. A 15 Hz flashing stimulus is known to elicit a significant response in humans; however, the optimal flashing pattern for birds remained unclear. We investigated the effect of different flickering patterns, specifically 12.5, 15, and 20 Hz, on crows when illuminated from a distance within 200 meters. The flashlight used was a long-range model and the Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) consumed about 9 watts of power. The power was supplied by 21700 type lithium-ion batteries. Using a long-range flashlight during daylight, we determined that a 15 Hz flashing stimulus was most effective. This finding suggests that the most intense stimulus identified in human physiology can be equally effective when applied to birds. Survival analysis estimated that by projecting this pattern from a distance of 100 meters, crows fled within 8.1 seconds. Unlike traditional bird damage control techniques that rely on neophobia, this study utilizes physiological aversion. In this regard, our approach is fundamentally different from traditional techniques. The method of using flashing light to stimulate the brain, rather than the eyes, is based on insights from human medical and physiological studies. These findings elucidate the principle of a novel aversive stimulus using flashing light, which holds potential for widespread application in mitigating bird-related issues.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Abrupt light transitions in illuminance and CCT result in different temporal dynamics and interindividual variability for sensation, comfort and alertness 93%
- Animal-appropriate housing of ball pythons (Python regius)-- Behavior-based evaluation of two types of housing systems 93%
- A new automated chilled adult release system for the aerial distribution of sterile male tsetse flies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific Wavelengths of Light Modulate Honey Bee Locomotor Activity 94%
- Melanophore and fluoroleucophore synergistically photo-protect the Arabian killifish, Aphanius dispar, embryo from ultraviolet light 93%
- Optokinetic response in D. Melanogaster reveals the nature of common repellent odorants. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated escape system: identifying prey's kinematic and behavioral features critical for predator evasion 94%
- Behavioural evidence of spectral opponent processing in the visual system of stomatopod crustaceans 93%
- The distress context of social calls evokes a fear response in the bat Pipistrellus abramus 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiological and cognitive consequences of a daily 26h photoperiod in a primate (M. murinus) 91%
- Effects of Ambient Temperature on the Recognition and Preferences for Host Song Pulse-rate by the Acoustic Parasitoid Fly Ormia ochracea 90%
- Visual processing and collective motion-related decision-making in desert locusts 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.