Back

The potential applications of high-resolution 3D scanners in the taxonomic classification of insects

Peacock, C. J.; Evans, W.; Goodman, S. J.; Hassall, C.

2024-06-18 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.06.17.599367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The phenotypic classification of small biological specimens, such as insects, can be dependent on phenotypic features that are difficult to observe and communicate to others. Here, we evaluate how high-resolution 3D photogrammetric scanner technology can potentially allow such features to be resolved and visualised as a 3D models, which can then be shared as a taxonomical resource for species identification, as virtual type specimens, and for educational and public engagement purposes. We test the viability and limitations of this approach using specimens digitised with a Artec Micro scanner. Ten samples from unique species were mounted and scanned. The model outputs were evaluated against an identification key, which compiled diagnostic features for the specimens from the wider literature, to describe the specimens to the lowest taxonomic level possible. The results showed that six of the ten specimens could be identified to species level using the scans. Threshold values for body length and width were 10.7 mm and 4.4 mm respectively. Below these body dimensions important diagnostic features of specimens could not be resolved reliably. This result suggests that with current technology, 3D photogrammetric modelling is a viable method for taxonomic identification of a wide range of insect groups with larger body sizes. This approach opens up novel applications for species identification and data sharing among taxonomists, international field research, conservation efforts, and entomological outreach. However, the limitations of this approach to taxonomic identification must be considered depending upon the size of the specimen and its diagnostic features. Future developments in the technology and processing methods used may alleviate the constraints on body size exhibited in this study, widening the applications for smaller bodied specimens.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.3%
2
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
4
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
5
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
6
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
16
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%