Back

Prevalence and Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Early after Stroke

Klingman, K. J.; Billinger, S. A.; Britton-Carpenter, A.; Bartsch, B. L.; Duncan, P. W.; Fulk, G. D.

2024-06-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.06.16.24309011 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) negatively impacts post-stroke recovery. This studys purpose: examine the prevalence of undiagnosed OSA and describe a simple tool to identify those at-risk for OSA in the early phase of stroke recovery. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional descriptive study of people [~]15 days post-stroke. Adults with stroke diagnosis admitted to inpatient rehabilitation over a 3-year period were included if they were alert/arousable, able to consent/assent to participation, and excluded if they had a pre-existing OSA diagnosis, other neurologic health conditions, recent craniectomy, global aphasia, inability to ambulate 150 feet independently pre-stroke, pregnant, or inability to understand English. OSA was deemed present if oxygen desaturation index (ODI) of >=15 resulted from overnight oximetry measures. Prevalence of OSA was determined accordingly. Four participant characteristics comprised the "BASH" tool (body mass index >=35, age>=50, sex=male, hypertension=yes). A receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed with BASH as test variable and OSA presence as state variable. ResultsParticipants (n=123) were 50.4% male, averaged 64.12 years old (sd 14.08), and self-identified race as 75.6% White, 20.3% Black/African American, 2.4%>1 race, and 1.6% other; 22% had OSA. ROC analysis indicated BASH score >=3 predicts presence of OSA (sensitivity=0.778, specificity=0.656, area under the curve =0.746, p<0.001). ConclusionsPrevalence of undiagnosed OSA in the early stroke recovery phase is high. With detection of OSA post-stroke, it may be possible to offset untreated OSAs deleterious impact on post-stroke recovery of function. The BASH tool is an effective OSA screener for this application.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.