Back

Optimization of Soluble Expression of CTA1-(S14P5)4-DD and CTA1-(S21P2)4-DD Fusion Proteins as Candidates for COVID-19 Intranasal Vaccines

Tarigan, S.; Sumarningsih, S.; Setyawati, D. R.; Tarigan, R.; Sekarmila, G.; Apas, A.; Putri, R.

2024-06-14 immunology
10.1101/2024.06.13.598952 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developing intranasal vaccines against pandemics and devastating airborne infectious diseases is imperative. The superiority of intranasal vaccines over injectable systemic vaccines is evident, but the challenge in developing effective intranasal vaccines is more substantial. Fusing a protein antigen with the catalytic domain of cholera toxin (CTA1) and the two-domain D of staphylococcal protein A (DD) has significant potential for intranasal vaccines. In the present study, we constructed two fusion proteins containing CTA1, tandem repeat linear epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S14P5 or S21P2), and DD. The in silico characteristics and solubility of the fusion proteins CTA1-(S14P5)4-DD and CTA1-(S21P2)4-DD were analyzed when overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Structural predictions indicated that each component of the fusion proteins was compatible with its origin. Both fusion proteins were predicted by computational tools to be soluble when overexpressed in E. coli. Contrary to these predictions, the constructs exhibited limited solubility. The solubility did not improve even after lowering the cultivation temperature from 37{degrees}C to 18{degrees}C. Induction with IPTG at the early log phase, instead of the usual mid-log phase growth, significantly increased soluble CTA1-(S21P2)4-DD but not CTA1-(S14P5)4-DD. The solubility of overexpressed fusion proteins significantly increased when a non-denaturing detergent (Nonidet P40, Triton X100, or Tween 20) was added to the extraction buffer. In a scale-up purification experiment, the yields were low, only 1-2 mg/L of culture, due to substantial losses during the purification stages, indicating the need for further optimization of the purification process.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.1%
3
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
26
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Protein Expression and Purification
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
28
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%