Back

Differential contribution of direct and indirect pathways from dorsolateral and dorsomedial striatum to motor symptoms in Huntington's disease mice

Conde-Berriozabal, S.; Sitja-Roqueta, L.; Garcia-Garcia, E.; Garcia-Gilabert, L.; Sancho-Balsells, A.; Fernandez-Garcia, S.; Rodriguez-Urgelles, E.; Giralt, A.; Lopez-Gil, J.; Munoz-Moreno, E.; Castane, A.; Soria, G.; Rodriguez, M. J.; Alberch, J.; Masana, M.

2024-06-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.06.12.597534 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The alterations in the basal ganglia circuitry associated with motor symptoms in Huntingtons Disease (HD) have been extensively investigated. Yet, the specific contribution of the direct and indirect striatal output pathways from the dorsolateral (DLS) and dorsomedial striatum (DMS) to the motor dysfunction is still not fully understood. Here, using the symptomatic R6/1 male mouse model of HD, strong functional connectivity alterations between DMS and DLS regions with the rest of brain were observed by fMRI, particularly pronounced in the DLS. Then, we systematically evaluated how the selective optogenetic stimulation of the direct and indirect pathways from DLS and DMS influences locomotion, exploratory behavior, and motor learning. In wild type (WT) mice, optogenetic stimulation of the direct pathway from DLS and the indirect pathway from DMS elicited subtle locomotor enhancements, while exploratory behavior remained unaltered. Additionally, stimulation of the indirect pathway from DLS improved the performance in the accelerated rotarod task. In contrast, in HD mice, optogenetic stimulation of the distinct striatal pathways did not modulate these behaviors. Overall, this study points to deficits in the integration of neuronal activity in HD mice, while it contributes to deeper understanding of the complexity of motor control by the diverse striatal subcircuits.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.