Back

TLCellClassifier: Machine Learning Based Cell Classification for Bright-Field Time-Lapse Images

Jiang, Q.; Sudalagunta, P. R.; Meads, M.; Zhao, X.; Achille, A.; Noyes, D.; Silva, M.; Canevarolo, R. R.; Shain, K.; Silva, A.; Zhang, W.

2024-06-14 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.06.11.598552 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immunotherapies have shown promising results in treating patients with hematological malignancies like multiple myeloma, which is an incurable but treatable bone marrow-resident plasma cell cancer. Choosing the most efficacious treatment for a patient remains a challenge in such cancers. However, pre-clinical assays involving patient-derived tumor cells co-cultured in an ex vivo reconstruction of immune-tumor micro-environment have gained considerable notoriety over the past decade. Such assays can characterize a patients response to several therapeutic agents including immunotherapies in a high-throughput manner, where bright-field images of tumor (target) cells interacting with effector cells (T cells, Natural Killer (NK) cells, and macrophages) are captured once every 30 minutes for upto six days. Cell detection, tracking, and classification of thousands of cells of two or more types in each frame is bound to test the limits of some of the most advanced computer vision tools developed to date and requires a specialized approach. We propose TLCellClassifier (time-lapse cell classifier) for live cell detection, cell tracking, and cell type classification, with enhanced accuracy and efficiency obtained by integrating convolutional neural networks (CNN), metric learning, and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, respectively. State-of-the-art computer vision software like KTH-SE and YOLOv8 are compared with TLCellClassifier, which shows improved accuracy in detection (CNN) and tracking (metric learning). A two-stage LSTM-based cell type classification method is implemented to distinguish between multiple myeloma (tumor/target) cells and macrophages/monocytes (immune/effector cells). Validation of cell type classification was done both using synthetic datasets and ex vivo experiments involving patient-derived tumor/immune cells. Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/QibingJiang/cell classification ml

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
14
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%