Back
Top 6%
19.0%
#1
19.0%
Top 45%
15.7%
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Top 0.7%
3.0%
Top 10%
2.1%
Top 15%
2.1%
Top 15%
1.7%
Top 4%
1.6%
Top 88%
1.4%
Top 7%
1.4%
Top 16%
1.1%
Top 22%
1.0%
Top 16%
1.0%
Top 25%
0.8%
Top 5%
0.8%
Top 14%
0.8%
Top 32%
0.8%
Top 33%
0.8%
Inclusion, characteristics and credibility of systematic reviews in doctoral theses: A cross-sectional study of all Medical Faculties in Sweden
2024-06-11
epidemiology
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
ObjectiveSystematic reviews (SRs) are essential to ensure that decisions are informed by an up-to-date and complete understanding of the relevant research evidence. Conducting SRs within a doctoral thesis can reduce redundant, harmful and unethical research, identify knowledge gaps, and help the doctoral student obtain important skills to conduct and use research. The output and learning process of SRs overlaps with the aims of doctoral programs. We aim to explore to what extent SRs are included...
Predicted journal destinations
1
BMJ Open
553 training papers
2
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
29 training papers
3
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
4
Research Synthesis Methods
17 training papers
5
BMC Medical Research Methodology
41 training papers
6
BMC Medicine
155 training papers
7
BMC Public Health
148 training papers
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
116 training papers
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
54 training papers
10
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
65 training papers
12
BMJ Global Health
95 training papers
13
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
14
PLOS Medicine
95 training papers
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
110 training papers
16
European Journal of Epidemiology
36 training papers
17
Epidemiology and Infection
80 training papers
18
Frontiers in Public Health
135 training papers
19
PLOS Global Public Health
287 training papers