Back

Laboratory horror stories: Poison in the agars

Davidson, M. K.; Protacio, R. U.; Helmlinger, D.; Wahls, W. P.

2024-06-06 microbiology Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.06.06.597796 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a single-celled eukaryote that can be cultured as a haploid or as a diploid. Scientists employ mating, meiosis, and the plating of ascospores and cells to generate strains with novel genotypes and to discover biological processes. Our two laboratories encountered independently sudden-onset, major impediments to such research. Spore suspensions and vegetative cells no longer plated effectively on minimal media. By systematically analyzing multiple different media components from multiple different suppliers, we identified the source of the problem. Specific lots of agar, from different suppliers, were toxic. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect was attenuated on rich media. Consequently, quality control checks that use only rich media can provide false assurances on the quality of the agar. Lastly, we describe likely sources of the toxicity and we provide specific guidance for quality control measures that should be applied by all vendors as preconditions for their sale of agar. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=116 SRC="FIGDIR/small/597796v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@41d7c1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bbec24org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18c6f76org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e9b707_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Take-awayO_LISporadically, batches of agar from different suppliers strongly inhibit the plating efficiency of S. pombe spores and vegetative cells on minimal media. C_LIO_LIQuality control checks that are not quantitative or that use only rich media can provide false assurances on the quality of the agar. C_LIO_LIVendors should conduct rigorous, thorough, organism-specific tests for potential toxicity of each lot of agar as a pre-condition for its sale. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
6
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
22
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
23
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%