School-based caries prevention using silver diamine fluoride: A pragmatic randomized trial in low-income rural children
Ruff, R. R.; Niederman, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundDental caries is the worlds most prevalent noncommunicable disease, disproportionately affecting children from low-income families and rural geographic areas. MethodsThe CariedAway 3.0 study was a cluster-randomized pragmatic non-inferiority trial comparing silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to sealants and atraumatic restorations (ART) for the prevention and control of dental caries. All participants also received fluoride varnish. Analysis consisted of mixed-effects logistic regression for caries prevalence and weighted least squares and mixed-effects negative binomial regression for caries incidence. A non-inferiority margin of 10% for the difference between groups was used. Dental caries was defined as an ICDAS score of four or greater. ResultsA total of 3345 children were enrolled across 35 schools; however there was a large proportion of children who were noncompliant and received external dental care over the course of the trial. In adjusted analyses of compliant participants (n=1083; 543 in the SDF group and 540 in the sealant and ART group), there was no difference in the weighted risk difference between treatment groups (B=0.003, 95% CI = -0.0001, 0.0008). The odds of caries prevalence was elevated in the SDF group in longitudinal analyses (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.86, 2.11) but was not significant and was below the non-inferiority margin. There were no significant differences between groups for caries incidence in adjusted models (IRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.74). Results for intent to treat analyses were similar to that of per-protocol. DiscussionIn this school-based clinical trial, the prevalence of dental caries in children treated with SDF and fluoride varnish was non-inferior compared to those treated with sealants, ART, and fluoride varnish, although the overall risk was slightly higher. Unfortunately, a high rate of dropout and participant noncompliance was observed, likely due to the impacts of COVID-19 on study procedures. As a result, observed effects may be unreliable beyond the short-term. Trial Registration: NCT03448107
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 89%
- Pilot program for test-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and environmental monitoring in an urban public school district 86%
- Estimation of COVID-19 cases prevented by vaccination in California 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of an urban sanitation intervention on childhood enteric infection and diarrhea in Maputo, Mozambique: a controlled before-and-after trial 89%
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 89%
- An ancient dental signalling centre supports homology of an enamel knot in sharks 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health 92%
- A cluster-randomized trial of client and provider-directed financial interventions to align incentives with appropriate case management in retail medicine outlets: results of the TESTsmART Trial in western Kenya 89%
- The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial 87%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.