Zero-Shot Multimodal Question Answering for Assessment of Medical Student OSCE Physical Exam Videos
Holcomb, M. J.; Kang, S.; Shakur, A.; Vedovato, S.; Hein, D.; Dalton, T. O.; Campbell, K. K.; Scott, D. J.; Danuser, G.; Jamieson, A. R.
Show abstract
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a critical component of medical education whereby the data gathering, clinical reasoning, physical examination, diagnostic and planning capabilities of medical students are assessed in a simulated outpatient clinical setting with standardized patient actors (SPs) playing the role of patients with a predetermined diagnosis, or case. This study is the first to explore the zero-shot automation of physical exam grading in OSCEs by applying multimodal question answering techniques to the analysis of audiovisual recordings of simulated medical student encounters. Employing a combination of large multimodal models (LLaVA-1.6 7B,13B,34B, GPT-4V, and GPT-4o), automatic speech recognition (Whisper v3), and large language models (LLMs), we assess the feasibility of applying these component systems to the domain of student evaluation without any retraining. Our approach converts video content into textual representations, encompassing the transcripts of the audio component and structured descriptions of selected video frames generated by the multimodal model. These representations, referred to as "exam stories," are then used as context for an abstractive question-answering problem via an LLM. A collection of 191 audiovisual recordings of medical student encounters with an SP for a single OSCE case was used as a test bed for exploring relevant features of successful exams. During this case, the students should have performed three physical exams: 1) mouth exam, 2) ear exam, and 3) nose exam. These examinations were each scored by two trained, non-faculty standardized patient evaluators (SPE) using the audiovisual recordings--an experienced, non-faculty SPE adjudicated disagreements. The percentage agreement between the described methods and the SPEs determination of exam occurrence as measured by percentage agreement varied from 26% to 83%. The audio-only methods, which relied exclusively on the transcript for exam recognition, performed uniformly higher by this measure compared to both the image-only methods and the combined methods across differing model sizes. The outperformance of the transcript-only model was strongly linked to the presence of key phrases where the student-physician would "signpost" the progression of the physical exam for the standardized patient, either alerting when they were about to begin an examination or giving the patient instructions. Multimodal models offer tremendous opportunity for improving the workflow of the physical examinations evaluation, for example by saving time and guiding focus for better assessment. While these models offer the promise of unlocking audiovisual data for downstream analysis with natural language processing methods, our findings reveal a gap between the off-the-shelf AI capabilities of many available models and the nuanced requirements of clinical practice, highlighting a need for further development and enhanced evaluation protocols in this area. We are actively pursuing a variety of approaches to realize this vision.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 94%
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 93%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 92%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 92%
- From Tool to Teammate: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-AI Collaborative Workflows for Diagnosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- One LLM is not Enough: Harnessing the Power of Ensemble Learning for Medical Question Answering 94%
- Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes: Measuring Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records 92%
- Design and implementation of a system for automated monitoring of adherence to evidenced-based clinical guideline recommendations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 92%
- Large Language Models in Real-World Clinical Workflows: A Systematic Review of Applications and Implementation 91%
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Integrated with the Clinical Workflow for Inpatient Discharge Date Prediction 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.