Back

Anaesthesia and delirium: a Mendelian randomization study

Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, C.; Tan, L.

2024-06-03 anesthesia
10.1101/2024.06.02.24308334 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDelirium is a frequent complication in hospitalized older adults post-surgery associated with adverse outcomes. Although anaesthesia is traditionally linked to increased delirium risk, the causal relationship remains uncertain. MethodsWe conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics to explore the causal effects of different anaesthesia types (general, regional, and local) on delirium risk. We employed the weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods for estimation and conducted sensitivity analyses to address pleiotropy and heterogeneity. ResultsGenetically determined anaesthesia types showed no significant causal effect on delirium risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or significant heterogeneity. ConclusionsMendelian randomization provides strong evidence against a causal link between genetically determined anaesthesia and increased delirium risk.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.