Back

A systematic review on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for bladder cancer

Muhammad, U.; Ahmad, U.; Ibrahim, B.; Ahmad, A. A.; LIMAN, H. U.

2024-06-03 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.06.02.24308331 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBladder cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide. Despite its high incidence, public awareness of the condition remains low, and it has received less research attention compared to other common cancers. Over the past 80 years, patient outcomes and treatment strategies have remained largely unchanged, with cystoscopy being the primary method for detecting bladder cancer. This procedure, often repeated during long-term surveillance due to the recurrent nature of bladder tumors, is both uncomfortable for patients and costly for healthcare providers. The identification and validation of molecular biomarkers in blood, urine, or tissue could facilitate tumour detection and reduce reliance on cystoscopy. AimThis study aims to identify potential molecular biomarkers for bladder cancer that could improve tumour detection and lessen the need for repeated cystoscopies. MethodsA systematic review was conducted, searching for articles related to bladder cancer biomarkers in four databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. Studies that met the inclusion criteria underwent title/abstract screening and full-text review. A total of twenty studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. ResultsThe review identified several gene product biomarkers, including TEAD4, TPM1, TPM2, SKA3, EO1, HYAL3, MTDH, EPDR1, hTERT, KRT7, SW, ARHGAP9, XPH4, OTX1, BUB1, and Usp28. Additionally, protein product biomarkers were identified, such as A1AT, APOE, AG, CA9, IL8, MMP9, MMP10, PAI1, SCDI1, SDC1, VEGFA, CD73, TIP2, CXCL5, PCAT6, and NCR3LG1 (B7-H6). ConclusionThe study highlights the potential of various gene and protein biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer. Further research is necessary to validate these biomarkers diagnostic and prognostic potential in identifying bladder cancer in suspected cases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.5%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.7%
6
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
15
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
17
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
18
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
29
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%