Prediction of oncogene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a special focus on artificial-intelligence-based methods
Fuster-Matanzo, A.; Pico-Peris, A.; Bellvis-Bataller, F.; Jimenez-Pastor, A.; Weiss, G. J.; Marti-Bonmati, L.; Lazaro-Sanchez, A.; Banna, G. L.; Addeo, A.; Alberich-Bayarri, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alternative strategies to determine patient oncogene mutation status are essential to overcome some of the drawbacks associated with current methods. We aimed to review the use of radiomics alone or in combination with clinical data and to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models on the prediction of oncogene mutation status. MethodsA PRISMA-compliant literature review was conducted. The Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published through June 30, 2023 predicting oncogene mutation status in patients with NSCLC using radiomics. Independent meta-analyses evaluating the performance of AI-based models developed with radiomics features or with a combination of radiomics features plus clinical data for the prediction of different oncogenic driver mutations were performed. A meta-regression to analyze the influence of methodological/clinical factors was also conducted. ResultsOut of the 615 studies identified, 89 evaluating models for the prediction of epidermal growth factor-1 (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutations were included in the systematic review. A total of 38 met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analyses. The AI algorithms sensitivity/false positive rate (FPR) in predicting EGFR, ALK, and KRAS mutations using radiomics-based models was 0.753 (95% CI 0.721-0.783)/0.346 (95% CI 0.305-0.390), 0.754 (95% CI 0.639-0.841)/ 0.225 (95% CI 0.163-0.302), and 0.744 (95% CI 0.605-0.846)/0.376 (95% CI 0.274-0.491), respectively. A meta-analysis of combined models was only possible for EGFR mutation, revealing a sensitivity/FPR of 0.800 (95% CI 0.767-0.830)/0.335 (95% CI 0.279-0.396). No statistically significant results were obtained in the meta-regression. ConclusionsRadiomics-based models may represent valuable non-invasive tools for the determination of oncogene mutation status in NSCLC. Further investigation is required to analyze whether clinical data might boost their performance.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 94%
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 93%
- Comparison of Radiomic Feature Aggregation Methods for Patients with Multiple Tumors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 93%
- Simplified Molecular Classification of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on EGFR, KRAS, and TP53 Mutations 91%
- Deep learning-based tumor microenvironment segmentation is predictive of tumor mutations and patient survival in non-small-cell lung cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 89%
- Trabectedin in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Real-world Data on Effectiveness, Safety, and Financial Implications from a European Comprehensive Cancer Centre 88%
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma Grade Classification with Prognostic Significance 92%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.