Back

Large-scale integration of omics and electronic health records to identify potential risk protein biomarkers and therapeutic drugs for cancer prevention and intervention

Li, Q.; Song, Q.; Chen, Z.; Choi, J. Y.; Moreno, V.; Ping, J.; Wen, W.; Li, C.; Shu, X.; Yan, J.; Shu, X.-o.; Cai, Q.; Long, J.; Huyghe, J. R.; Pai, R.; Gruber, S. B.; Casey, G.; Wang, X.; Toriola, A. T.; Li, L.; Singh, B.; Lau, K. S.; Zhou, L.; Wu, C.; Peters, U.; Zheng, W.; Long, Q.; Yin, Z.; Guo, X.

2024-05-31 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.05.29.24308170
Show abstract

Identifying risk protein targets and their therapeutic drugs is crucial for effective cancer prevention. Here, we conduct integrative and fine-mapping analyses of large genome-wide association studies data for breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, and characterize 710 lead variants independently associated with cancer risk. Through mapping protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) for these variants using plasma proteomics data from over 75,000 participants, we identify 365 proteins associated with cancer risk. Subsequent colocalization analysis identifies 101 proteins, including 74 not reported in previous studies. We further characterize 36 potential druggable proteins for cancers or other disease indications. Analyzing >3.5 million electronic health records, we conducted analyses of emulated trials for 11 drugs across 290 comparisons and identified three drugs significantly associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk: caffeine vs. paroxetine (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.64), haloperidol vs. prochlorperazine (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.68), and trazodone hydrochloride vs. paroxetine (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38-0.63). Conversely, caffeine was associated with increased cancer risk in comparisons with finasteride (colorectal cancer) and fluoxetine (breast cancer). Meta-analysis identified six drugs significantly associated with cancer risk, including acetazolamide, which was associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87). This study identifies novel protein biomarkers and candidate drug targets across six major cancer types and highlights several approved drugs with potential chemopreventive effects.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 29%
6.4%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
6.4%
4
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 3%
5.8%
5
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 14%
5.3%
6
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 2%
5.0%
7
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
8
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
2.9%
9
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
10
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 85%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
12
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
15
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
17
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
18
npj Parkinson's Disease
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
23
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 15%
0.7%
28
Genome Biology
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
29
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 21%
0.7%