Back

Fibroblasts carrying intermediate C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions from iNPH patients show impaired energy metabolism but no cell pathologies

Hoffmann, D.; Korhonen, V.; Rostalski, H.; Huber, N.; Heikkinen, S.; Hietanen, T.; Wittrahm, R.; Leskela, S.; Rauramaa, T.; Hartikainen, P.; Solje, E.; Portaankorva, A.; Hiltunen, M.; Leinonen, V.; Haapasalo, A.

2024-06-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.05.28.595117 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions (C9-HRE) are the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a group of neurodegenerative syndromes leading to cognitive dysfunction and frontal and temporal atrophy. FTD is a potential comorbidity of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and carrying the C9-HRE can modify the age-of-onset in iNPH patients. While intermediate-length C9-HRE (<30 repeats) are often considered non-pathogenic, the exact pathological cutoff is unclear. In this study, we assessed whether fibroblasts from iNPH patients carrying intermediate C9-HRE display C9-HRE-associated pathological hallmarks and changes in cellular function. C9-HRE-associated RNA foci were not detected in the intermediate carriers. The number of p62-positive puncta was significantly increased only in long C9-HRE carrier fibroblasts, in line with p62-positive intracellular inclusions observed in a brain biopsy from the patient. Specific parameters of mitochondrial respiration were significantly reduced in both the long and intermediate C9-HRE carrier fibroblasts. Fibroblasts from the intermediate C9-HRE carriers showed upregulated glycolytic activity, possibly to counteract the reduced mitochondrial respiration, which could not be observed in the long C9-HRE carriers. In conclusion, these data suggest that while the long C9-HRE leads to more severe cellular pathologies than intermediate C9-HRE, the latter might predispose cells to pathological changes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.