Post-stroke delirium and associations with neuroimaging biomarkers on routine Computed Tomography (CT): a cohort study
Mead, G. E.; Barugh, A. J.; MacLullich, A. M.; ferguson, k.; Shenkin, S. D.; Farrall, A. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundDelirium affects a quarter of patients after acute stroke and predicts poorer outcomes. Our aim was to determine whether either qualitative assessment or quantitative assessments of the regional atrophy obtained from routinely performed computed tomography (CT) brain imaging could identify those most at risk of developing delirium. MethodsWe recruited 95 patients with acute stroke (age [≥]65) over one year. Follow-up for delirium and cognition was performed at 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28 days, 4 months and 12 months. All participants underwent routine CT brain (Toshiba 64-slice or 128-slice scanner). White matter disease and atrophy were rated qualitatively (mild, moderate, severe). Atrophy in multiple specific areas was measured quantitatively. ResultsTwenty-six (27%) developed delirium during the 12 months of follow-up. On univariable analysis, delirium was associated with increasing age, being female, less independent in pre-stroke activities of daily living, pre-existing cognitive impairment, increasing stroke severity, having had a total anterior circulation stroke and global cerebral atrophy on brain CT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that only global cerebral atrophy, being female and having a more severe stroke predicted delirium. This model accounted for between 38% and 55% of the variance in delirium. For quantitative CT analysis, on univariable analysis, delirium was associated with atrophy in several specific brain areas. On multivariable analysis, only NIHSS (for every one point increase OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; p=0.006)) and cistern ambiens ratio (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.48-4.96; p=0.028) were significantly associated. This model accounted for between 35.1% and 51.2% of delirium variance. ConclusionClinical variables together with either qualitative atrophy assessment or cistern ambiens ratio on routine CT brain could identify stroke patients most at risk of delirium and to stratify patients in clinical trials of delirium prevention and treatment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: a national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis 93%
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 93%
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dementia Risk Following Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Factors Collected at Time of Stroke Diagnosis 92%
- Effect of cognitive reserve on physiological measures of cognitive workload in older adults with cognitive impairments 91%
- The Association of Alzheimer’s Disease-related Blood-based Biomarkers with Cognitive Screening Test Performance in the Congolese Population in Kinshasa 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Delirium and Neuropsychological Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: an Institutional Case Series 92%
- Optimising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: Protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study 92%
- The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 92%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 92%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.