Back

The Longevity Landscape: Value Creation for Healthy Aging

Mekniran, W.; Giger, O.-F.; Fleisch, E.; Kowatsch, T.; Jovanova, M.

2024-05-28 health policy
10.1101/2024.05.28.24308017 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe global aging population underscores a critical need to tackle accompanying health and economic challenges, at all levels of society. This All-of-Society approach emphasizes the involvement of various stakeholders--governments, NGOs, researcher centers, private companies, local communities, and opinion leaders--to collectively promote healthy aging. However, how stakeholders enable healthy longevity remains unclear. ObjectiveThis study examines how global stakeholders (governments, NGOs, researcher centers, private companies, local communities, and opinion leaders) create value towards healthy longevity. We identify the healthy longevity dimension of stakeholders value propositions and examine alignment between their propositions as an indicator of shared goals. MethodsFollowing the All-of-Society approach, we analyzed the healthy longevity aspects of value propositions among the six classes of stakeholders (N=128). We (1) employed semantic topic modeling to identify the primary value proposition topics as related to healthy longevity and (2) computed proposition alignment using similarity networks. ResultsOur analysis revealed varying degrees of alignment between stakeholders healthy longevity propositions, with the lowest alignment observed for local communities and researcher centers. ConclusionsFindings underscore a key need to strengthen synergies between academic and community-based initiatives to promote translational science and highlight opportunities for strategic partnerships in the evolving healthy longevity field. What is already known on this topicThe National Academy of Medicines All-of-Society approach advocates for multi-stakeholder engagement towards healthy longevity, but specific stakeholder contributions, and their alignment toward shared goals, are poorly understood. What this study addsTo our knowledge, this study is the first to provide empirical evidence into the value propositions of healthy longevity stakeholders on a societal scale. It highlights key areas where multi-stakeholder collaboration can be strengthened--particularly between academic and local community initiatives--and proposes five strategies to strengthen collaboration. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyPrioritizing (1) community-based participatory research, (2) translating healthy aging-related research findings into accessible resources, (3) prioritizing equity in intervention delivery, (4) establishing community advisory boards, and (5) developing knowledge translation and training programs, could potentially better align academic and community efforts towards more aligned, equitable and effective healthy longevity initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.6%
3
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
8
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
10
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
13
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
16
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%