Developing an Indicator for Age-Friendly Communities: The Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study
Fujihara, S.; Noguchi, T.; Ide, K.; Jeong, S.; Kondo, K.; Ojima, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundAge-friendly communities (AFCs) aim to create inclusive societies for older people. Despite the World Health Organization (WHO)s emphasis on incorporating dementia-friendliness across all phases, including planning, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, and scale-up, there are very few community-level indicators that incorporate dementia-friendly elements. ObjectiveTo develop a community-level AFC indicator based on WHO AFC guidelines incorporating dementia-friendly elements, and examine its validity and reliability. DesignA repeated cross-sectional study using data from the 2016 and 2019 waves of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. Setting and SubjectsData were collected from 61 school districts in 16 Japanese municipalities, involving 45,162 individuals aged [≥]65 years in 2016, and 39,313 in 2019. The 2016 and 2019 datasets were the development and retest samples, respectively. MethodsAfter identifying 23 candidate items according to the WHO AFC guidelines and expert reviews, data were aggregated by school district. Exploratory factor analysis on the 2016 data helped derive factor structure, confirming reproducibility with the 2019 data. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. ResultsThe final 17-item indicator comprised three subscales: Social inclusion and dementia-friendliness (7 items, = 0.86), Social engagement and communication (5 items, = 0.78), and Age-friendly physical environment (5 items, = 0.82). The structure showed adequate test-retest reliability (r = 0.71-0.79; ICC = 0.67-0.78). ConclusionsA valid and reliable 17-item community-level indicator was developed, which aligns with the WHO framework and also incorporates dementia-friendly elements. This indicator is useful for monitoring and evaluating to promote the AFC and dementia-friendly communities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive function in Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline 97%
- Cognition, physical function, and life purpose in the rural elderly population: a systematic review protocol 96%
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Delivery of Age-friendly Health Services in Primary Health Care Centres in Southwest, Nigeria: A Qualitative Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 96%
- Comparison of Care Utilization and Medical Institutional Death among Older Adults by Home Care Facility Type: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Fukuoka, Japan 95%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stable Sparse Classifiers predict cognitive impairment from gait patterns 92%
- Are the Items of the Starkstein Apathy Scale Fit for the Purpose of Measuring Apathy Post-Stroke? 91%
- A cross-sectional survey of material deprivation and suicide-related ideation among Vietnamese technical interns in Japan in 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of the current state of frailty indexes and their implementation for aging intervention studies 91%
- Metformin improves cognition of aged mice by promoting cerebral angiogenesis and neurogenesis 88%
- A Poisson distribution-based general model of cancer rates and a cancer risk-dependent theory of aging 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 95%
- Ageing and Dementia: Age-Period-Cohort Effects of Policy Intervention in England, 2006-2016 95%
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.