Back

Lifespan analysis of repeat expression reveals age-dependent upregulation of HERV-K in the neurotypical human brain

Evans, T. A.; Feltrin, A. S.; Benjamin, K. J.; Katipalli, T.; Hyde, T.; Kleinman, J. E.; Wenberger, D. R.; Paquola, A. C.; Erwin, J. A.

2024-05-17 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.05.17.24307184 medRxiv
Show abstract

DNA repetitive sequences (or repeats) comprise over 50% of the human genome and have a crucial regulatory role, specifically regulating transcription machinery. The human brain is the tissue with the highest detectable repeat expression and dysregulations on the repeat activity are related to several neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, as repeat-derived products can stimulate a pro-inflammatory response. Even so, it is unclear how repeat expression acts on the aging neurotypical brain. Here, we leverage a large postmortem transcriptome cohort spanning the human lifespan to assess global repeat expression in the neurotypical brain. We identified 21,696 differentially expressed repeats (DERs) that varied across seven age bins (Prenatal; 0-15; 16-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60+) across the caudate nucleus (n=271), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n=304), and hippocampus (n=310). Interestingly, we found that long interspersed nuclear elements and long terminal repeats (LTRs) DERs were the most abundant repeat families when comparing infants to early adolescence (0-15) with older adults (60+). Of these differentially regulated LTRs, we identified 17 shared across all brain regions, including increased expression of HERV-K-int in older adult brains (60+). Co-expression analysis from each of the three brain regions also showed repeats from the HERV subfamily were intramodular hubs in its subnetworks. While we do not observe a strong global relationship between repeat expression and age, we identified HERV-K as a repeat signature associated with the aging neurotypical brain. Our study is the first global assessment of repeat expression in the neurotypical brain.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.