Correlating hippocampal and amygdala volumes with neuropathological burden in neurodegenerative diseases using 7T postmortem MRI
Liou, J.-J.; Li, J.; Berardinelli, J.; Jin, H.; Santini, T.; Noh, J.; Farhat, N.; Wu, M.; Aizenstein, H.; Mettenburg, J. M.; Yong, W.; Head, E.; Ikonomovic, M.; Ibrahim, T.; Kofler, J.
Show abstract
Numerous research groups worldwide have focused on postmortem imaging to bridge the resolution gap between clinical neuroimaging and neuropathology data. We developed a standardized protocol for brain embedding, imaging, and processing, facilitating alignment between antemortem MRI, postmortem MRI, and pathology to observe brain atrophy and structural damage progression over time. Using 7T postmortem ex vivo MRI, we explore the potential correlation of amygdala and hippocampal atrophy with neuropathological burden in both Down syndrome (DS) and Alzheimers disease (AD) cohorts. Using 7T postmortem ex vivo MRI scans from 66 cases (12 DS and 54 AD) alongside a subset of antemortem scans (n=17), we correlated manually segmented hippocampal and amygdala volumes, adjusted for age, sex, and ApoE4 status, with pathological indicators such as Thal phase, Braak stage, limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) stage, hippocampal sclerosis (HS), and Lewy body (LB) stage. A significant correlation was observed between postmortem and antemortem volumes for the hippocampus, but a similar trend observed for the amygdala did not reach statistical significance. DS individuals exhibited notably smaller hippocampal and amygdala volumes compared to AD subjects. In DS, lower hippocampal and amygdala volumes correlated with more severe Braak stage, without significant associations with Thal phase. LATE and HS pathologies were uncommon in DS cases but trended toward smaller hippocampal volumes. In AD, lower hippocampal volume associated with dementia duration, advanced Thal phase, Braak stage, LATE stage, and HS presence, whereas reduced amygdala volume correlated mainly with severe LATE stage and HS, but not with Thal or Braak stages. No significant LB correlation was detected in either DS or AD cohorts. Hippocampal volume in AD appears influenced by both AD and LATE pathologies, while amygdala volume seems primarily influenced by LATE. In DS, smaller hippocampal volume, relative to AD, appears primarily influenced by tau pathology.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter integrity is associated with cognition and amyloid burden in older adult Koreans along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum 98%
- Plasma biomarkers identify brain ATN abnormalities in a dementia-free population-based cohort 97%
- Medial temporal lobe atrophy patterns in early- versus late-onset amnestic Alzheimer's disease 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- APOE-ε 4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer’s disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology 95%
- Circular RNA detection identifies circPSEN1 alterations in brain specific to Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease 95%
- TNF-mediated neuroinflammation is linked to neuronal necroptosis in Alzheimer's disease hippocampus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Temporal Relationships between White Matter Hyperintensities, Neurodegeneration, Amyloid β, and Cognition 96%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 96%
- Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alzheimer's disease clinical variants show distinct regional patterns of neurofibrillary tangle accumulation 96%
- Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome-Alzheimer's disease 95%
- Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer's disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.