Pharmacological HDAC3 inhibition alters memory updating in young and old mice
Smies, C. W.; Bellfy, L.; Wright, D. S.; Bennetts, S. S.; Urvan, M. W.; Brunswick, C. A.; Shu, G.; Kwapis, J. L.
Show abstract
Long-term memories are not stored in a stable state but must be flexible and dynamic to maintain relevance in response to new information. Existing memories are thought to be updated through the process of reconsolidation, in which memory retrieval initiates destabilization and updating to incorporate new information. Memory updating is impaired in old age, yet little is known about the mechanisms that go awry. One potential mechanism is the repressive histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), which is a powerful negative regulator of memory formation that contributes to age-related impairments in memory formation. Here, we tested whether HDAC3 also contributes to age-related impairments in memory updating using the Objects in Updated Locations (OUL) paradigm. We show that blocking HDAC3 immediately after updating with the pharmacological inhibitor RGFP966 ameliorated age-related impairments in memory updating in 18-m.o. mice. Surprisingly, we found that post-update HDAC3 inhibition in young (3-m.o.) mice had no effect on memory updating but instead impaired memory for the original information, suggesting that the original and updated information may compete for expression at test and HDAC3 helps regulate which information is expressed. To test this idea, we next assessed whether HDAC3 inhibition would improve memory updating in young mice given a weak, subthreshold update. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that HDAC3 blockade strengthened the subthreshold update without impairing memory for the original information, enabling balanced expression of the original and updated information. Together, this research suggests that HDAC3 may contribute to age-related impairments in memory updating and may regulate the strength of a memory update in young mice, shifting the balance between the original and updated information at test.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ensemble-specific deficit in neuronal intrinsic excitability in aged mice 96%
- Engram reactivation during memory retrieval predicts long-term memory performance in aged mice 95%
- Life-long Dietary Restrictions have Negligible or Damaging Effects on Late-life Cognitive Performance: A Key Role for Genetics in Outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bidirectional regulation of cognitive and anxiety-like behaviors by dentate gyrus mossy cells in male and female mice 94%
- Altered heterosynaptic plasticity impairs visual discrimination learning in adenosine A1 receptor knockout mice 93%
- Aberrant medial prefrontal cortex activity and flexible behavior in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer's disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Choline supplementation in early life improves and low levels of choline can impair outcomes in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. 94%
- Natural forgetting reversibly modulates engram expression 94%
- Constitutive AP2gamma deficiency reduces postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis and induces behavioral deficits in juvenile mice that persist during adulthood 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spread of pathological human Tau from neurons to oligodendrocytes and loss of high-firing pyramidal neurons in ageing mice 93%
- Distinct disease mutations in DNMT3A result in a spectrum of behavioral, epigenetic, and transcriptional deficits 92%
- Pathological tau alters head direction signaling and induces spatial disorientation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuronal activity-related transcription is blunted in immature compared to mature dentate granule cells 92%
- Novel measures of Morris water maze performance that use vector field maps to assess accuracy, uncertainty, and intention of navigational searches 92%
- Developmental onset of enduring long-term potentiation in mouse hippocampus 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.