Back

Assessing Immune Microenvironment in TCGA-LUAD via CIBERSORTx Using Single-Cell Derived Signature Matrix and ESTIMATE Algorithm

Verma, M.

2024-05-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.05.08.592760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lung cancer (LC) remains a significant global health concern, affecting millions worldwide each year. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) play a crucial role in Lung Cancer progression and prognosis, with various immune cell types infiltrating the tumor microenvironment. Traditional methods like immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry have limitations in accurately profiling TIIC subtypes. However, recent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing and computational algorithms like CIBERSORTx offer a promising approach for characterizing TIICs in bulk tumor samples. In this study, we undertook the validation of the signature matrix comprising 14 distinct immune cell types and subtypes, which was originally derived from PBMC single-cell RNA-seq data, in our previous work (Verma, 2024). The positive controls included 8 bulk RNA-seq samples of whole blood and specific immune cell bulk RNA-seq samples, while the negative control comprised neuroblastoma cell lines lacking immune content. Subsequently, we applied this signature matrix to deconvolute TCGA-LUAD data (n = 598), and assessed tumor purity and immune-stromal content using the ESTIMATE algorithm. Our findings indicate that the signature matrix accurately reflected flow cytometry-derived fractions, supported by correlation analysis. Specifically, the second positive control and negative control accurately reflected immune and non-immune sample fractions, respectively, further validating the efficacy of our approach. This study also provide insights into the invasion of immunocytes in lung adenocarcinoma and highlight the potential of computational tools like CIBERSORTx and ESTIMATE in characterizing the immune microenvironment of LC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.2%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
Computational Biology and Chemistry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.3%
11
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%