Back

Dysregulated intestinal nutrient absorption in obesity is associated with epigenomic alterations in epithelia

Badurdeen, D. S.; Li, Z.; Lee, J.-H.; Ma, T.; Bhagwate, A. V.; Latanich, R.; Dogiparthi, A.; Ordog, T.; Kovbasnjuk, O.; Kumbhari, V.; Foulke-Abel, J.

2025-03-02 cell biology
10.1101/2024.05.06.591758 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Obesity is an epidemic with myriad health effects, but little is understood regarding individual obese phenotypes and how they may respond to therapy. Epigenetic changes associated with obesity have been detected in blood, liver, pancreas, and adipose tissues. Previous work using human organoids found that dietary glucose hyperabsorption is a steadfast trait in cultures derived from some obese subjects, but detailed transcriptional or epigenomic features of the intestinal epithelia associated with this persistent phenotype are unknown. This study evaluated differentially expressed genes and relative chromatin accessibility in intestinal organoids established from donors classified as non-obese, obese, or obese hyperabsorptive by body mass index and glucose transport assays. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that obese hyperabsorptive subject organoids have significantly upregulated dietary nutrient absorption transcripts and downregulated type I interferon targets. Chromatin accessibility and transcription factor footprinting predicted that enhanced HNF4G binding may promote the obese hyperabsorption phenotype. Quantitative RT-PCR assessment in organoids representing a larger subject cohort suggested that intestinal epithelial expression of CUBN, GIP, SLC5A11, and SLC2A5 were highly correlated with hyperabsorption. Thus, the obese hyperabsorption phenotype was characterized by transcriptional changes that support increased nutrient uptake by intestinal epithelia, potentially driven by differentially accessible chromatin. Recognizing unique intestinal phenotypes in obesity provides a new perspective in considering therapeutic targets and options to manage the disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.