Feasibility of time-restricted eating during pregnancy and effect on glycemic control in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes. A randomized controlled trial
Skarstad, H. S.; Haganes, K. L.; Sujan, M. A. J.; Gellein, T. M.; Johansen, M. K.; Salvesen, K. A.; Hawley, J. A.; Moholdt, T.
Show abstract
Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a nutritional intervention that confines the daily time-window for energy intake. TRE reduces fasting glucose concentrations in non-pregnant individuals, but whether this eating protocol is feasible and effective for glycemic control in pregnancy is unknown. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the feasibility and effect of a 5-week TRE intervention among pregnant individuals at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), compared with a usual-care control group. Participants underwent 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests and estimation of body composition, before and after the intervention. Interstitial glucose levels were continuously measured, and adherence rates and ratings of hunger were recorded daily. Thirty of 32 participants completed the trial. Participants allocated to TRE reduced their daily eating window from 12.3 (SD 1.3) to 9.9 (SD 1.0) h, but TRE did not affect glycemic measures, blood pressure, or body composition, compared with the control group. TRE increased hunger levels in the evening, but not in the morning, and induced only small changes in dietary intake. A 5-week TRE intervention was feasible for pregnant individuals with increased risk of GDM but had no effect on cardiometabolic outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Interscapular fat is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance independent of visceral fat mass 93%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 92%
- Efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate in adults with overweight or obesity: A meta-analysis and systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effects of Weight Loss and Incretin-Based Therapies on Endothelial Vasodilatory and Fibrinolytic Function 95%
- A Microbiome-targeting Fiber-enriched Nutritional Formula is Well Tolerated and Improves Quality of Life and Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 94%
- Safety and effects of acetylated and butyrylated high amylose maize starch in recently diagnosed youths with type 1 diabetes; a Pilot Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of time-restricted eating vs. standard dietary advice on weight, metabolic health and the consumption of processed food: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in community-based adults 96%
- Almond Consumption Improves Inflammatory Profiles Independent of Weight Change: A 6-Week Randomized Controlled Trial in Adults with Obesity 95%
- A Pilot Study on the Effects of Medically Supervised, Water-Only Fasting and Refeeding on Cardiometabolic Risk 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Observational assessments of the relationship of dietary and pharmacological treatment on continuous measures of dysglycemia over 24 hours in women with gestational diabetes 95%
- Patterns and Predictors of Weight Loss with Exenatide Treatment in Overweight and Obese Women 94%
- Weight Loss-Independent Changes in Human Growth Hormone During Water-Only Fasting: A Secondary Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 96%
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 93%
- The German Gestational Diabetes Study (PREG): Rationale, Methodology and Design 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.