Numerical Cincinnati Stroke Scale versus Stroke Severity Screening Tools for the Prehospital Determination of LVO
Wagstaff, H. M.; Crowe, R. P.; Youngquist, S. T.; Stoecklein, H. H.; Treichel, A.; He, Y.; Majersik, J. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrevious research demonstrated that the numerical Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) identifies large vessel occlusion (LVO) at similar rates compared to a limited number of stroke severity screening tools. We aimed to compare numerical CPSS to additional stroke scales using a national EMS database. MethodsUsing the ESO Data Collaborative, the largest EMS database with hospital linked data, we retrospectively analyzed prehospital patient records for the year 2022. Stroke and LVO diagnoses were determined by ICD-10 codes from linked hospital discharge and emergency department records. Prehospital CPSS was compared to the Cincinnati Stroke Triage Assessment Tool (C-STAT), the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED), and the Balance Eyes Face Arm Speech Time (BE-FAST). The optimal prediction cut-points for LVO screening were determined by intersecting the sensitivity and specificity curves for each scale. To compare the discriminative abilities of each scale among those diagnosed with LVO, we used the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). ResultsWe identified 17,442 prehospital records from 754 EMS agencies with [≥] 1 documented stroke scale of interest: 30.3% (n=5,278) had a hospital diagnosis of stroke, of which 71.6% (n=3,781) were ischemic; of those, 21.6% (n=817) were diagnosed with LVO. CPSS score [≥] 2 was found to be predictive of LVO with 76.9% sensitivity, 68.0% specificity, and AUROC 0.787 (95% CI 0.722-0.801). All other tools had similar predictive abilities, with sensitivity / specificity / AUROC of: C-STAT 62.5% / 76.5% / 0.727 (0.555-0.899); FAST-ED 61.4% / 76.1%/ 0.780 (0.725-0.836); BE-FAST 70.4% / 67.1% / 0.739 (0.697-0.788). ConclusionThe less complex CPSS exhibited comparable performance to three frequently employed LVO detection tools. EMS agency leadership, medical directors, stroke system directors, and other stroke leaders may consider the complexity of stroke severity instruments and challenges with ensuring accurate recall and consistent application when selecting which instrument to implement. Use of the simpler CPSS may enhance compliance with the utilization of LVO screening instruments while maintaining the accuracy of prehospital LVO determination.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment Based on Temporal Gradient: A dose-escalation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 95%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 94%
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 96%
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 95%
- Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe Stroke 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of the STANDING algorithm in patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness, a multicentre prospective study (STANDING-M) 92%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 90%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.