Back

Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for treatment of metastatic/recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of all anatomic sites of origin and other malignant salivary gland tumors

Chae, Y. K.; Duan, R.; Chung, L. I.-Y.; Oh, Y.; Borislav, A.; Shin, S.; Kim, S.; Helenowski, I.; Matsangou, M.; Villaflor, V.; Mahalingam, D.

2024-05-02 oncology
10.1101/2024.04.29.24306581 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDual checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has been FDA-approved for a number of cancer sites. However, their role in the treatment of ACC and other salivary gland carcinomas is not well established. Methods and analysisWe performed a Simons two-stage prospective single-institution phase II clinical trial of nivolumab with ipilimumab. Two cohorts were analyzed: patients with metastatic/recurrent ACC and patients with other salivary gland cancers. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. ResultsPatients with ACC (n=19) and other salivary gland carcinomas (total n=5) were enrolled. The patients with ACC had median OS 30.0 months (95% CI 15.3-NR months), median PFS 8.3 months (95% CI 5.5-30.0 months), and disease control rate (DCR) 53% (10/19). The ORR in the ACC group was 5% (CR 0%, n=0; confirmed PR 5%, n=1), with one patient having continued stable disease at the time of trial conclusion. The patients with other salivary gland cancers had median OS 10.4 months (95% CI 6.21-NR months), median PFS 6.21 months (95% CI 2.83-NR months), and DCR 40% (2/5). The ORR in this cohort was 0%. ConclusionIn patients with recurrent or metastatic ACC and other salivary gland neoplasms, combination nivolumab with ipilimumab resulted in moderate disease control. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings. Trial number: NCT03146650

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.