Back

Non-invasive fasciculation assessment of gastrocnemius failed to show diagnostic or prognostic utility in ALS

Muir, R.; O'Shea, B.; Iniesta, R.; Masood, U.; Cabassi, C.; Planinc, D.; Hodson-Tole, E.; Drakakis, E.; Boutelle, M.; Shaw, C. E.; Bashford, J.

2024-04-30 neurology
10.1101/2024.04.29.24306549 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder, affecting both upper and lower motor neurons. High-density surface electromyography is a non-invasive measure of muscle fasciculations, a phenomenon prevalent early in the disease. Previous studies highlighted the clinical importance of these measures from the biceps brachii muscle. Our study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the medial gastrocnemius muscle. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 49 ALS and 25 control participants. Means comparisons, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multilevel Cox model were used to determine the predictive utility of fasciculation potential (FP) parameters including FP frequency, median amplitude, and amplitude dispersion. ResultsFP parameters demonstrated a poor ability to differentiate between ALS and controls, with ROC analysis producing areas under the curve between 0.58 and 0.63. Furthermore, there was no association between FP parameters and ALS prognosis in the Cox model. ConclusionsFP parameters from the medial gastrocnemius muscle are not useful for the diagnosis or prognosis of ALS patients. SignificanceOur results highlight the poor clinical utility of fasciculation quantification in the medial gastrocnemius muscle. Future studies should focus on recordings from more clinically relevant muscles earlier in the disease. HighlightsO_LIFasciculation parameters from the medial gastrocnemius muscle have poor ability to differentiate ALS patients from controls. C_LIO_LIFasciculation parameters from the medial gastrocnemius muscle cannot reliably predict the prognosis of ALS patients. C_LIO_LIFuture studies should measure more clinically relevant muscles at an earlier stage in the disease course over a protracted period. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
13
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
19
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Journal of Parkinson’s Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%