Back

Taking advantage of reference-guided assembly in a slowly-evolving lineage: application to Testudo graeca.

MIRA-JOVER, A.; Gracia, E.; Giminez, A.; Fritz, U.; Rodriguez-Caro, R. C.; Bourgeois, Y.

2024-04-28 genomics
10.1101/2024.04.25.591224 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundObtaining de novo chromosome-level genome assemblies greatly enhances conservation and evolutionary biology studies. For many research teams, long-read sequencing technologies (that produce highly contiguous assemblies) remain unaffordable or unpractical. For the groups that display high synteny conservation, these limitations can be overcome by a reference-guided assembly using a close relative genome. Of chelonians, terrestrial tortoises are considered one of the most endangered taxa, which calls for more genomic resources. Here we make the most of high synteny conservation in chelonians to produce the first chromosome-level genome assembly of genus Testudo with one of the most iconic tortoise species in the Mediterranean basin: T. graeca. ResultsWe used high quality, paired-end Illumina sequences to build a reference-guided assembly with the chromosome level assembly of Gopherus evgoodei. We reconstructed a 2.29 Gb haploid genome with a scaffold N50 of 107.598 Mb and 5.37% gaps. We sequenced 25998 protein-coding genes, and a 41.2% fraction was determined as repetitive in our assembled genome. Demographic history reconstruction based on the genome revealed two events (population decline and recovery) consistent with previously suggested phylogeographic patterns for the species. This outlines the value of genomes like this for phylogeographic studies. ConclusionsOur results highlight the value of using close relatives to produce de novo draft assemblies in species where such resources are unavailable. Our Testudo graeca annotated genome paves the way to delve deeper into the species evolutionary history and provides a valuable resource to increase making direct conservation efforts on their threatened populations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.7%
2
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
5
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%