Secondhand tobacco exposure assessed using urinary cotinine among 10 years children in Japan: A 11-years repeated cross-sectional study
Tamada, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Tabuchi, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe emergence of heated tobacco products (HTPs) has complicated the issue of secondhand tobacco (SHT) exposure. We investigated the trend in SHT exposure in schoolchildren and assessed whether SHT exposure depends on household tobacco use status. MethodsThis repeated cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2021 (15,927 subjects were eligible) was based on data from an annual survey of fourth-grade students (aged 10 years) in Kumagaya City, located in Kanto Region, Japan. Data were collected by questionnaire, and urinary cotinine levels used as an objective indicator of SHT exposure, such as secondhand exposure to combustible cigarette (CC) smoke and HTP-generated aerosols. ResultsSHT exposure has decreased by about one-quarter over the 11-year period, from 18.6% in 2011 to 5.3% in 2021. Regarding household tobacco product use, 68.1% did not use tobacco products, 16.5% were CC-only users, 12.3% were HTP-only users, and 3.0% were both CC and HTP users. The prevalence of SHT exposure among participants was significantly higher compared to participants with no tobacco product users in the household, in the following order: both CC and HTP users, only CC users, and only HTP user. ConclusionsWhile the prevalence of SHT exposure showed a decreasing trend during 2011-2021, the prevalence of SHT exposure was higher in schoolchildren from families with tobacco product users than in schoolchildren from families without tobacco product users, regardless of the type of tobacco product.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are the relevant risk factors being adequately captured in empirical studies of smoking initiation? A machine learning analysis based on the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study 92%
- Cost Comparison and Spending on Tobacco Products: Evidence from A Nationally Representative Sample of Adult E-Cigarette Users 92%
- What is the relationship between raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco above 20 and cigarette smoking? A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking employees in the workplace: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China 97%
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 95%
- Systems biology analysis of publicly available transcriptomic data reveals a critical link between AKR1B10 gene expression, smoking and occurrence of lung cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A pilot biomonitoring study of cumulative phthalates exposure among Vietnamese American nail salon workers 91%
- Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles 90%
- Associations between respiratory health outcomes and coal mine fire PM2.5 smoke exposure: a cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 93%
- Lung cancer mortality in the wake of the changing smoking epidemic: a descriptive study of the global burden in 2020 and 2040 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Compliance with Smoke-Free Laws in Purbakhola Rural Municipality, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study 92%
- Air pollution exposure, respiratory consequences, and perceptions among urban African children living in poor conditions – a case study in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire 92%
- Changes in the prevalence of the common risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Uganda between 2014 and 2023: Informed by nationally representative cross-sectional surveys 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.