Automated detection of large vessel occlusion using deep learning: a pivotal multicenter clinical trial and reader assessment study
Kim, J. G.; Ha, S. Y.; Kang, Y.-R.; Hong, H.; Kim, D.; Lee, M.; Sunwoo, L.; Ryu, W.-S.; Kim, J.-T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis multicenter clinical trial evaluated the stand-alone efficacy and the improvements in diagnostic accuracy of early-career physicians using a deep learning-based software to detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) in CT angiography (CTA). MethodsThis multicenter pivotal clinical trial included 595 ischemic stroke patients from January 2018 to September 2023. Standard reference and LVO locations (intracranial internal carotid artery [ICA], M1, or M2) were determined by consensus among three expert vascular neurologists after reviewing CTA, MR imaging, and symptom data. The performance of the JLK-LVO software was evaluated against a standard reference, and its impact on the diagnostic accuracy of four residents involved in stroke care was assessed. Performance metrics included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). ResultsAmong the 595 patients (mean age 68.5 {+/-} 13.4 years, 56% male), 275 (46.2%) had LVO. The median time interval from the last known well moment to the CTA was 46 hours (IQR 11.8 to 64.4). For LVO detection, the software demonstrated a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 97%. For isolated M2 occlusions, it achieved a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 96%. The reader assessment study showed that reading with software assistance improved the sensitivity by 4.0% and AUROC by 2.4% (all p < 0.001) compared to readings without AI assistance. ConclusionThe software demonstrated a high detection rate for proximal LVO and moderate sensitivity for isolated MCA-M2 occlusion. In addition, the software improved diagnostic accuracy of early-career physicians in detecting LVO.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 96%
- Long term stability of patients undergoing endovascular parent artery occlusion of their intracranial artery 96%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions 96%
- Early recanalization among patients undergoing bridging therapy with tenecteplase or alteplase 95%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deviation From Personalized Blood Pressure Targets Correlates With Worse Outcome After Successful Recanalization 94%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 94%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome after Stroke Independent of Reperfusion Grade 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 96%
- Quantification of Patent Foramen Ovale Shunt Severity by Transesophageal Echocardiogram and Transcranial Doppler in Routine Clinical Practice 95%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Identification of Thrombectomy Amenable Vessel Occlusion on Computed Tomography Angiography using Deep Learning 99%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 96%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.