User testing on Foods with Function Claims labelling in Japan :An attempt to establish an integrated evaluation system for the usefulness of health information materials
Yamamoto, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Takano-Ohmuro, H.; Yamamoto, R.; Saruwatari, J.
Show abstract
The saturation of self-care products in the market is coupled with inadequate information on their safe usage. In Japan, although foods with function claims (FFC) are prevalent, their labelling falls short in quality and effectiveness as health information, impeding consumer comprehension and proper utilization. Hence, it is imperative to establish a system that assesses the efficacy of labelling information from both provider and user perspectives. From providers or healthcare professionals perspective, we already developed a Communication Index to assess FFC labelling, which we utilized to evaluate five FFC products. Those products achieved a proficiency level of approximately 70%, falling below the acceptance criteria. Particularly, challenges were identified in understanding some of the terms and locating important information on the labels. In this study, we conducted user-testing from the user perspective for five same FFC labels to evaluate them using semi-structured interviews with 50 participants of diverse ages and sexes. A passing criterion for comprehension was set as [≥]90% correct responses to all questions. Of the five FFC products, one passed the user-testing criterion with a 2-min response time; however, none passed the 1-min response time test. The proportions of correct answers were notably low for questions on diet and allergies (each 50-90%), concomitant medications (50-100%), storage (30-100%), and handling (30-100%). Participants comments revealed a lack of familiarity with FFC, highlighting that the terms and text in the labelling were confusing and overly technical. User-testing provides valuable insights for improving FFC labelling, thereby ensuring safe and appropriate use by aligning with consumers understanding and perceptions. We assessed FFC label information from both the provider and user perspectives, but neither yielded satisfactory results. Consequently, the implementation of an integrated system capable of evaluating FCC labels as health information material from both perspectives would be necessary.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From seed to flour: sowing sustainability in the use of cantaloupe melon residue (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) 95%
- Food environment components influencing consumption trends of neglected and underutilized species in northern Benin 93%
- Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advertising ultra-processed foods around urban and rural schools in Kenya 93%
- Drug Supply Management at First-level Public Health Facilities: Case of Pyay District, Myanmar 92%
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 91%
- Factors affecting zero-waste behaviors: Focusing on the health effects of microplastics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying the Nova food classification to food product databases using discriminative ingredients: a methodological proposal 94%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 91%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.