Back

The Causal Association between Gut Microbiota and Pancreatic Cancer: A Two-sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis in European and East Asian Populations

Xiao, Y.; Li, X.; Zou, L.; Wall, D. M.; Liang, Z.

2024-04-23 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.04.23.24306212 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimAlterations in the gut microbiota strongly correlate with the onset of pancreatic cancer (PC). However, any causal relationship between gut microbiota alterations and PC risk remains unknown. MethodsWe comprehensively investigated PC-related microorganisms in European and East Asian populations through the application of Mendelian randomization (MR). The PC genome-wide association study (GWAS) databases for European and East Asian individuals were acquired from the UK and Japanese Biobanks, respectively. Primary analytical methods, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, weighted median, Maximum likelihood method and MR PRESSO, were employed to estimate the potential causal association between gut microbiota and PC. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analysis and reverse MR analysis. ResultsBy IVW method, overall 17 bacterial taxa were identified with potential causal correlations to PC. The PC-associated gut microbiota signatures varied across different populations. Among these, 4 specific taxa exhibited potential causality with PC, with statistical significance in all four MR methods. Specifically, the Alcaligenaceae family was identified as protective, while genus Sutterella, order Bacilliales and genus Enterohabdus were associated with increased risk of PC. Among the European population within the UK biobank, the Alcaligenaceae family, genus Sutterella, and order Bacillales were connected to PC, while genus Enterohabdus was linked to PC in the Japanese cohort. ConclusionOur study implicates certain members of the gut microbiota in PC onset based on genetics. Further investigations of the gut-pancreas axis may lead to the development of novel microbiome targeted prevention strategies for PC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.