Back

Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation lasting >= 3 years

zhong, z.; An, J.; Shen, J.; zhang, Q.; Wu, X.; Gao, L.; Wei, Y.; Chen, S.; Lu, X.; Xu, J.; Ding, Y.; Cheng, c.; Cai, L.; Xu, M.; Liu, S.; Zhou, G.

2024-04-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.04.11.24305700 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRadiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSP-AF) remains challenging, especially in patients with very long atrial fibrillation (AF) duration. ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of RFCA in patients with LSP-AF lasting [≥] 3 years, and to identify predictors for AF recurrence. MethodsThis retrospective study included 151 patients with LSP-AF undergoing first-time RFCA. Procedure was performed with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) based individualized ablation strategy, guided by ablation index (AI). Patients were followed up for [≥] 18 months, and recurrence predictors were determined. ResultsEnrolled patients (mean persistent AF duration: 7.6 {+/-} 5.2 years) had a mean age of 65.3 {+/-} 9.2 years and the median left atrial diameter (LAD) was 45.0 (42.0-49.0) mm. PVI was achieved in all, followed by modified left posterior wall isolation (PWI) in 147 patients. Additional ablation after PWI was performed in 88 patients. During the 18-month follow-up, the overall success rate was 74.2%. Multivariate analysis identified AF duration (HR 1.078; 95% CI 1.020-1.139; P = 0.007), LAD (HR 1.069; 95% CI 1.010-1.132; P = 0.022), and pre-procedure CRP (HR 1.063; 95% CI 1.010-1.117; P = 0.018) as independent predictors of AF recurrence. Among patients with PVI and PWI, those without empirical additional ablation (EAA) had a lower but not statistically significant recurrence rate (18.6%) than those with EAA (31.8%, P = 0.076). ConclusionAmong LSP-AF patients, the long-term efficacy of AI-guided RFCA is acceptable, especially in selected patients. However, EAA after PVI and PWI may be unhelpful.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.