Back

Gastric digestion and amino acid concentrations of casein from cow and goat milk: a randomized crossover trial in healthy men

van Eijnatten, E. J. M.; Camps, G.; Rombouts, W.; Pellis, L.; Smeets, P. A. M.

2024-04-12 nutrition
10.1101/2024.04.10.24305606 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn vitro studies show that goat milk proteins form less compact coagulates in the stomach compared to cow milk proteins, which may facilitate gastric digestion and amino acid (AA) absorption. However, this has not been confirmed in vivo in humans. ObjectiveTo examine gastric digestion and changes in AA concentrations after cow milk-derived (cow MC) and goat milk-derived casein (goat MC) ingestion. MethodsIn this single-blind randomized cross-over study 18 men (age 23 {+/-} 1.6 years, BMI 23 {+/-} 1.6 kg/m2) consumed 300 ml of a drink containing 30 g of cow MC or goat MC. Participants underwent gastric MRI scans at baseline and every 10 minutes up to 60 minutes postprandially. Blood was drawn at baseline and up to 4 hours postprandially. In addition, participants verbally rated their appetite after each MRI measurement. Primary outcomes were gastric emptying and AA concentrations. Secondary outcome was gastric coagulation as inferred by image texture metrics. ResultsGastric emptying half-time was 80 {+/-} 25 minutes for goat and 85 {+/-} 24 minutes for cow MC (p = 0.395). In line with this, gastric emptying of the drinks over time was similar (MD 0.77 ml, 95% CI [-6.9, 8.5], p=0.845). Serum essential AA (MD -110 {micro}mol/L, 95% CI [-162, -58]) was higher over time for cow MC (p<0.001). The image texture metric contrast was lower for cow MC (MD 0.010, 95% CI [0.001, 0.020], p=0.036). ConclusionCow MC and goat MC have different coagulating properties, as inferred by AA concentrations and supported by image texture analysis. This did not influence overall gastric emptying or the emptying of the liquid and coagulated fractions, which were similar. This warrants further in vivo research on casein coagulation in the food matrix to help determine the optimal use for cow and goat milk and their protein fractions. Financial support: the study was funded by Ausnutria Dairy Corporation Ltd. Clinical trial registry number: NL8137 (Netherlands Trial Registry), accessible through https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL-OMON28580

Published in The Journal of Nutrition (predicted rank #23) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
3
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
5
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Physiology & Behavior
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
14
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
17
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
20
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Journal of Dairy Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
The Journal of Nutrition · published here
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%