Gastric digestion and amino acid concentrations of casein from cow and goat milk: a randomized crossover trial in healthy men
van Eijnatten, E. J. M.; Camps, G.; Rombouts, W.; Pellis, L.; Smeets, P. A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn vitro studies show that goat milk proteins form less compact coagulates in the stomach compared to cow milk proteins, which may facilitate gastric digestion and amino acid (AA) absorption. However, this has not been confirmed in vivo in humans. ObjectiveTo examine gastric digestion and changes in AA concentrations after cow milk-derived (cow MC) and goat milk-derived casein (goat MC) ingestion. MethodsIn this single-blind randomized cross-over study 18 men (age 23 {+/-} 1.6 years, BMI 23 {+/-} 1.6 kg/m2) consumed 300 ml of a drink containing 30 g of cow MC or goat MC. Participants underwent gastric MRI scans at baseline and every 10 minutes up to 60 minutes postprandially. Blood was drawn at baseline and up to 4 hours postprandially. In addition, participants verbally rated their appetite after each MRI measurement. Primary outcomes were gastric emptying and AA concentrations. Secondary outcome was gastric coagulation as inferred by image texture metrics. ResultsGastric emptying half-time was 80 {+/-} 25 minutes for goat and 85 {+/-} 24 minutes for cow MC (p = 0.395). In line with this, gastric emptying of the drinks over time was similar (MD 0.77 ml, 95% CI [-6.9, 8.5], p=0.845). Serum essential AA (MD -110 {micro}mol/L, 95% CI [-162, -58]) was higher over time for cow MC (p<0.001). The image texture metric contrast was lower for cow MC (MD 0.010, 95% CI [0.001, 0.020], p=0.036). ConclusionCow MC and goat MC have different coagulating properties, as inferred by AA concentrations and supported by image texture analysis. This did not influence overall gastric emptying or the emptying of the liquid and coagulated fractions, which were similar. This warrants further in vivo research on casein coagulation in the food matrix to help determine the optimal use for cow and goat milk and their protein fractions. Financial support: the study was funded by Ausnutria Dairy Corporation Ltd. Clinical trial registry number: NL8137 (Netherlands Trial Registry), accessible through https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL-OMON28580
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gastric coagulation and postprandial amino acid absorption of milk is affected by mineral composition: a randomized crossover trial 97%
- Effects of the DailyColors™ Polyphenol Supplement on Serum Proteome, Cognitive Function, and Health in Older Adults at Risk of Cognitive and Functional Decline 91%
- Raw milk kefir: microbiota, bioactive peptides, and immune modulation. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 93%
- Effects of a novel infant formula on weight gain and body composition of infants: The INNOVA 2020 study 93%
- Oral bioavailability and metabolism of hydroxytyrosol from food supplements 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nutritional analysis of commercially available, complete plant- and meat-based dry dog foods in the UK 94%
- The time to peak blood bicarbonate (HCO3-), pH, and strong ion difference (SID) following sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) ingestion in highly trained adolescent swimmers 92%
- Validity and reliability of a new whole room indirect calorimeter to assess metabolic response to small-calorie loads 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- More spice, less salt: how capsaicin affects liking for and perceived saltiness of foods in people with smell loss 92%
- Effects of food-related odors on eating behavior: A systematic review 92%
- Evidence for a protein leverage effect on food intake but not on body mass index in a Norwegian population 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.