Back

Cortical Tau Aggregation Patterns associated with Apraxia in Alzheimer's Disease

Bischof, G. N.; Jaeger, E.; Giehl, K.; Jessen, F.; Onur, O. A.; O'Bryant, S.; Kara, E.; Weiss, P. H.; Drzezga, A.

2024-04-10 neurology
10.1101/2024.04.09.24305535 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesApraxia is a core feature of Alzheimers disease, but the pathomechanism of this characteristic symptom is not well understood. Here, we systematically investigated apraxia profiles in a well-defined group of patients with Alzheimers disease (AD; N=32) who additionally underwent PET imaging with the second-generation tau PET tracer [18F]PI-2620. We hypothesized that specific patterns of tau pathology might be related to apraxic deficits. MethodsPatients (N=32) with a biomarker-confirmed diagnosis of Alzheimers disease were recruited in addition to a sample cognitively unimpaired controls (CU1; N=41). Both groups underwent in-depth neuropsychological assessment of apraxia (Dementia Apraxia Screening Test; DATE and the Cologne Apraxia Screening; KAS). In addition, static PET imaging with [18F]PI-2620 was performed to assess tau pathology in the AD patients. To specifically investigate the association of apraxia with regional tau-pathology, we compared the PET-data from this group with an independent sample of amyloid-negative cognitively intact participants (CU2; N=54) by generation of z-score-deviation maps as well as voxel- based multiple regression analyses. ResultsWe identified significant clusters of tau-aggregation in praxis-related regions (e.g., supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, temporal, parietal and occipital regions) that were associated with apraxia. These regions were similar between the two apraxia assessments. No correlations between tau-tracer uptake in primary motor cortical or subcortical brain regions and apraxia were observed. ConclusionsThese results suggest that tau deposition in specific cortical brain regions may induce local neuronal dysfunction leading to a dose-dependent functional decline in praxis performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.