Pre-endoscopic screening of precancerous lesions in gastric cancer using deep learning
Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Wu, B.; Du, S.; Tang, K.; Li, S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveGiven the high cost of endoscopy in gastric cancer (GC) screening, there is an urgent need to explore cost-effective methods for the large-scale prediction of precancerous lesions of gastric cancer (PLGC). We aim to construct a hierarchical artificial intelligence-based multimodal non-invasive method for pre-endoscopic risk screening, to provide tailored recommendations for endoscopy. DesignFrom December 2022 to December 2023, a large-scale screening study was conducted in Fujian, China. Based on traditional Chinese medicine theory, we simultaneously collected tongue images and inquiry information from 1034 participants, considering the potential of these data for PLGC screening. Then, we introduced inquiry information for the first time, forming a multimodality artificial intelligence model to integrate tongue images and inquiry information for pre-endoscopic screening. Moreover, we validated this approach in another independent external validation cohort, comprising 143 participants from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital. ResultsA multimodality artificial intelligence-assisted pre-endoscopic screening model based on tongue images and inquiry information (AITonguequiry) was constructed, adopting a hierarchical prediction strategy, achieving tailored endoscopic recommendations. Validation analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of AITonguequiry were 0.74 for PLGC (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 0.76, p < 0.05) and 0.82 for high-risk PLGC (95% CI 0.82 to 0.83, p < 0.05), which were significantly and robustly better than those of the independent use of either tongue images or inquiry information alone, and also demonstrated superior performance compared to existing screening methodologies. In the independent external verification, the AUC values were 0.69 for PLGC and 0.76 for high-risk PLGC. ConclusionOur AITonguequiry artificial intelligence model, for the first time, incorporates inquiry information and tongue images, leading to a higher precision and finer-grained pre-endoscopic screening of PLGC. This enhances patient screening efficiency and alleviates patient burden.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 96%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 95%
- Classification of early and late stage Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients from their genomics and epigenomics profiles. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 96%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 92%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upregulation of ARHGAP9 is correlated with poor prognosis and immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 92%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 90%
- The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Liver Injury in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning on Primary Tumor Biopsy Slides 93%
- Cyclin G2 inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma growth and metastasis by binding to insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 and regulating the FAK-SRC-STAT signaling pathway 92%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.