Exome sequencing identifies HELB as a novel susceptibility gene for non-mucinous, non-high-grade-serous epithelial ovarian cancer
Dicks, E. M.; Tyrer, J. P.; Ezquina, S.; Jones, M.; Baierl, J.; Peng, P.-C.; Diaz, M.; Goode, E.; Winham, S. J.; Doerk, T.; Van Gorp, T.; De Fazio, A.; Bowtell, D.; Odunsi, K.; Moysich, K.; Pavanello, M.; Campbell, I.; Brenton, J. D.; Ramus, S. J.; Gayther, S. A.; Pharoah, P. D. P.
Show abstract
Rare, germline loss-of-function variants in a handful of genes that encode DNA repair proteins have been shown to be associated with epithelial ovarian cancer with a stronger association for the high-grade serous hiostotype. The aim of this study was to collate exome sequencing data from multiple epithelial ovarian cancer case cohorts and controls in order to systematically evaluate the role of coding, loss-of-function variants across the genome in epithelial ovarian cancer risk. We assembled exome data for a total of 2,573 non-mucinous cases (1,876 high-grade serous and 697 non-high grade serous) and 13,925 controls. Harmonised variant calling and quality control filtering was applied across the different data sets. We carried out a gene-by-gene simple burden test for association of rare loss-of-function variants (minor allele frequency < 0.1%) with all non-mucinous ovarian cancer, high grade serous ovarian cancer and non-high grade serous ovarian cancer using logistic regression adjusted for the top four principal components to account for cryptic population structure and genetic ancestry. Seven of the top 10 associated genes were associations of the known ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, MSH6 and PALB2 (false discovery probability < 0.1). A further four genes (HELB, OR2T35, NBN and MYO1A) had a false discovery rate of less than 0.1. Of these, HELB was most strongly associated with the non-high grade serous histotype (P = 1.3x10-6, FDR = 9.1x10-4). Further support for this association comes from the observation that loss of function variants in this gene are also associated with age at natural menopause and Mendelian randomisation analysis shows an association between genetically predicted age at natural menopause and endometrioid ovarian cancer, but not high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive Epithelial Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Genetic and Epidemiological Risk Factors 94%
- Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank 94%
- Population based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high grade serous ovarian cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical case study meets population cohort: Identification of a BRCA1 pathogenic founder variant in Orcadians 95%
- Polygenic Risk Modelling for Prediction of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk 94%
- An expanded analysis framework for multivariate GWAS connects inflammatory biomarkers to functional variants and disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank 93%
- Classification of Variants of Reduced Penetrance in High Penetrance Cancer Susceptibility Genes: Framework for Genetics Clinicians and Clinical Scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group-UK) 92%
- Impact of genetic counselling strategy on diagnostic yield and workload for whole genome sequencing-based tumour diagnostics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ovarian carcinosarcoma is a distinct form of ovarian cancer with poorer survival compared to tubo-ovarian high grade serous carcinoma 91%
- Using targeted therapy to promote a pro-inflammatory tumour microenvironment and anti-tumour immune response in high grade serous ovarian cancer 91%
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.