Back

Gender, interdisciplinary graduate training, and confidence working in teams

Lu, L. T.; Palucki Blake, L.; Eyler, J. R.; Verduzco, R.; Biswal, S. L.; Bennett, G. N.; Silberg, J. J.

2024-04-01 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.03.30.587416 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Teamwork is recognized as critical to solving complex societal challenges related to energy, health, and sustainability. With graduate education, students often gain teamwork experience through a problem-focused approach where they are brought into existing collaborations to pursue research that is focused on studying questions that have already been identified. Here, we describe an interdisciplinary educational program where graduate students were tasked with leading team formation, problem identification, and research formulation. This "team-first" training approach used a two-year curriculum to bring together students enrolled in diverse engineering and science graduate programs and provided students with a pedagogical understanding of interdisciplinarity, nurtured the development of student communication skills across disciplines, fostered student-led team formation and idea development, and empowered students to forge new connections between research groups. Assessment of three cohorts immediately following curriculum completion (n = 36) revealed significant gains in confidence in teamwork (p < 0.001) when compared to a control group of academic peers (n = 74). These gains varied across demographic groups, with women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics presenting the strongest gains. This finding illustrates the importance of exploring how interdisciplinary team curricula in graduate school could support overcoming the gender gap in confidence. SignificancePedagogical models for graduate education often neglect the importance of teamwork training. Here, we describe an interdisciplinary training program that was developed to bring together doctoral students from diverse science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines for a two-year curriculum that focused on teamwork training through student-led team formation, problem identification, and research formulation. Following program participation, we measured participant confidence in teamwork relative to a peer group. Our findings reveal gains with confidence in teamwork, with women presenting the strongest increases without negative effects on other groups. This pedagogical approach represents a strategy to close gender gaps in professional role confidence while complementing the benefits of traditional disciplinary training approaches.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%