Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhea: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Bao, Q.; Yao, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Xia, M.; Zhong, W.; Wu, K.; Yin, Z.; Liang, F.
Show abstract
IntroductionPrimary dysmenorrhea (PD) is the most common gynecological condition among young women. Although several non-pharmacological interventions have proven effective in relieving pain in patients with PD, the optimal treatment remains unknown. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will aim to compare and rank the analgesic effects of different non-drug interventions for PD. Methods and analysisRandomized controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions for PD will be identified via a search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases until May 2024. The primary outcome will be change in pain intensity among patients with PD, while the secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Two independent reviewers will perform document screening, study selection, and data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (V. 2). The RevMan, Stata, and Aggregate Data Drug Information System software will be used to perform a pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA in a random-effects model. The certainty of the evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required for this study because all data will be obtained from published research. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThis will be the first study to comprehensively compare the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhea using network meta-analysis. C_LIO_LIThe study will assess both short- and long-term efficacies of various non-pharmacological interventions in mitigating pain intensity among patients with primary dysmenorrhea. C_LIO_LIThis systematic review will be conducted in compliance with the Cochrane Handbook guidelines, which will ensure methodological rigor. C_LIO_LIOnly trials from English databases will be included, which may lead to omission of eligible studies in other languages. C_LIO_LIThe efficacy of different regimens of the same non-pharmacological intervention will not be investigated in this study. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 95%
- Side effect profile and comparative tolerability of newer generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 94%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects Of Mindfulness On Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Depression and Stress In Migraine 91%
- Prism adaptation treatment for upper-limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial 91%
- The Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulator Fenobam: Pharmacokinetics, Side Effects, and Analgesic Effects in Healthy Human Subjects. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
- Direct Economic Burden of Mental Health Disorders Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 91%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.