Back

Cardiovascular events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on randomized controlled trials or cohort trials: a safety meta-analysis

Zhang, C.; Zhao, J.; Shen, G.; Li, S.; Ma, F.; Li, H.; Tang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Qiu, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, F.; Huang, S.; Kong, F.

2024-04-04 oncology
10.1101/2024.03.29.24305099
Show abstract

BackgroundCDK4/6 inhibitors is highly valued, but the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVAEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors is not clear. MethodsEligible CVAEs were extracted from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and important meetings) until 3 September 2023 was conducted. A disproportionality analysis was performed from the first quarter (Q1) of 2013 to Q1 of 2023 using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Study heterogeneitywas assessed using the I2 statistic. Using Peto OR and inverse variance methods to calculate the risk and incidence of CVAEs associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Findings21 RCTs and cohort trials (n=24,331) were included. During the follow-up period of 8.4 to 34.0 months, CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of CVAEs (Peto OR, 1.64, 95% confidence interval, 1.23 - 2.21, P < 0.01). The rates of QT prolongation and deep vein thrombosis were 98.83 (89.6-100.1) and 6.41 (5.23-7.18) per 1000 patients, respectively. Moreover, we identified 11 CVAEs that were not reported in RCTs or cohort studies, acute coronary syndrome, atrial fibrillation, and mobile thrombophlebitis etc. were strongly correlated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, the risk of CVAEs varied depending on the specific CDK4/6 inhibitors used, its combination with different endocrine therapies, and the patients treatment stage. InterpretationCDK4/6 inhibitors increase the risk of CVAEs, some of which may lead to serious consequences, early recognition and management of CVAEs is of great importance in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 0.4%
13.4%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 48%
10.8%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 37%
5.0%
5
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 27%
3.1%
6
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 10%
2.7%
8
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.9%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 15%
1.9%
13
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 36%
1.3%
19
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 1.0%
1.3%
21
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
JAMA
based on 17 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
25
Microorganisms
based on 21 papers
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
30
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.7%