Back

Mechanism by which Aurora B inhibitors promotes RB and p53-dependent senescence.

Vora, S.; Andrew, A.; Kumar, R. P.; Nazareth, D.; Fernando, M.; Jones, M. J.; He, Y.; Hooper, J.; McMillan, N. A.; Urosevic, J.; Saeh, J.; Travers, J.; Gabrielli, B.

2024-03-28 cell biology
10.1101/2024.03.27.585450 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Polyploidy is a common outcome of chemotherapies, but there is conflicting evidence as to whether this is a source of increased chemotherapy resistance and aggressive disease, or a benign or even favorable outcome. We have used Aurora B kinase (AURKB) inhibitors that efficiently promote polyploidy in many cell types to investigate the fate of polyploid cells. We demonstrate AURKB inhibitor treatment of cells that have loss of RB and p53 function causes them to become hyper-polyploid, undergoing continuous rounds of growth, replication and failed mitosis/cytokinesis (endomitosis), whereas RB and p53 functional cells will eventually exit the cell cycle. These hyper-polyploid cells (>4n DNA content) are viable and undergo continuous endomitotic cycles, but have lost the ability to form viable colonies in vitro or form tumours in vivo. Investigation of mitosis in these cells revealed that centrosome duplication remained coupled to DNA replication, with the hyper-polyploid cells containing high numbers of centrosome that were capable of supporting functional mitotic spindle poles, but these failed to progress to anaphase/telophase structures even when AURKB inhibitor was removed after 2-3 days. However, when AURKB inhibitor was removed after 1 day and cells had failed a single cytokinesis to become tetraploid, they retained long term colony forming ability. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that tetraploidy is well tolerated by tumour cells but higher ploidy states are incompatible with long term proliferative potential.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
Cell Cycle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.6%
4
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
6
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
9
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
12
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
16
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
21
Molecular and Cellular Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
23
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%