Unbiased metagenomic detection of RNA viruses for rapid identification of viral pathogens in clinical samples
Kappell, A. D.; Scholes, A. N.; Scholz, M. B.; Keplinger, N. C.; Allen, L. W.; Murray, M. C.; Ternus, K. L.; Hewitt, F. C.
Show abstract
Unbiased long read sequencing approaches for clinical metagenomic sample analysis holds enormous potential for pathogen detection, including improved detection of unknown, novel or emerging viruses. However, the rapid rate of development in nanopore sequencing and library preparation methods complicates the process of selecting a standardized method for unbiased RNA virus detection. Here, we evaluate multiple sequencing approaches to identify a workflow with sufficient sensitivity, limits of detection, and throughput for potential utilization in a clinical laboratory setting. Four separate library preparation methods for the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION sequencer are compared, including direct RNA, direct cDNA, rapid cDNA, and double stranded cDNA. We also establish that depletion of host RNA is not required and can be deleterious for viral RNA detection in some instances when using samples in viral transport media (VTM) or plasma. Using unbiased whole genome amplification following reverse transcription, we achieve limits of detection on the order of 1.95E03 GE/mL of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus (VEEV) spiked in human plasma. We also report initial detection of 5.43E06 GE/mL of coronavirus 229E spiked into VTM samples containing human background RNA which are expected to decrease significantly during upcoming testing. These metrics were achieved within a 6-plex multiplex reaction, illustrating the potential to increase throughput and decrease costs for relevant sample analysis. Data analysis was performed using EPI2ME Labs framework and open access tools that are readily accessible to most clinical laboratories. Taken together, this work describes an optimized method for unbiased nanopore sequencing and analysis of RNA viruses present in two common clinical matrices.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter benchmarking of short and long read wet lab protocols for clinical viral metagenomics 96%
- CRISPR-cas13 enzymology rapidly detects SARS-CoV-2 fragments in a clinical setting 95%
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 96%
- Rapid, High-Throughput, Cost Effective Whole Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 Using a Condensed One Hour Library Preparation of the Illumina DNA Prep Kit 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing Methods Differ In Their Ability To Detect Variants From Low Viral Load Samples 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Variant Detection by Molecular-Clamping Based RT-qPCR 95%
- Evaluation of the Ultima Genomics UG 100 sequencer for low-cost, high-sensitivity metagenomic pathogen detection from cerebrospinal fluid 95%
- Targeted Hybridization Capture of SARS-CoV-2 and Metagenomics Enables Genetic Variant Discovery and Nasal Microbiome Insights 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- High throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Respiratory Viral Panel: A Diagnostic and Epidemiologic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses. 97%
- Accessible LAMP-Enabled Rapid Test (ALERT) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Scalable, Micro-Neutralization Assay for Qualitative Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies in Human Clinical Samples 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.