Back

A Novel Approach To Recovering Off-Track Aligner Treatment Through Hyper-Elastic Polymer Innovation

PHAN, L. X.; MORA, C.; KLUCINSKA, A.

2024-03-29 bioengineering Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.03.25.586642 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clear plastic aligners are becoming an increasingly popular choice for patients seeking orthodontic treatment. However, Industry Standard Aligners lack material properties that sustain tooth movement throughout the typical wear time for aligners. In a study compiling force data from existing Industry Standard Aligners and the OrthoFX Rescue Aligner, data points were plotted to compare the force profiles of each product. The Rescue Aligner aims to eliminate the mid-course correction process and provide consistent forces to improve treatment times and patient satisfaction.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 2%
41.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
○ 221 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.6%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Bioengineering
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Bone
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
20
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.6%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
● 40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
○ 189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
British Journal of Ophthalmology
● 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
27
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.