Back

Multi-trait genome-wide analysis identified novel risk loci and candidate drugs for heart failure

Yu, Z.; Lin, M.; Liang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ning, K.; Xia, L. C.

2024-03-27 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.03.24.24304812 medRxiv
Show abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a common cardiovascular syndrome that poses significant morbidity and mortality risks. While genome-wide association studies reporting on HF abound, its genetic etiology remains poorly elucidated, primarily due to its inherent polygenic nature. Furthermore, these genetic insights have not been fully leveraged for the development of effective primary treatment strategies for HF. In this study, we conducted a large-scale integrated multi-trait analysis using European-ancestry GWAS summary statistics of coronary artery disease and HF, involving near 2 million samples to identify novel risk loci associated with HF. 72 loci were newly identified with HF, of which 44 were validated in the replication phase. Transcriptome association analysis revealed 215 HF risk genes, including EDNRA and FURIN. Pathway enrichment analysis of risk genes revealed their enrichment in pathways closely related to HF, such as response to endogenous stimulus (adjusted P = 8.83x10-3), phosphate-containing compound metabolic process (adjusted P = 1.91x10-2). Single-cell analysis indicated significant enrichments of these genes in smooth muscle cells, fibroblast of cardiac tissue, and cardiac endothelial cells. Additionally, our analysis of HF risk genes identified 74 potential drugs for further pharmacological evaluation. These findings provide novel insights into the genetic determinants of HF, highlighting new genetic loci as potential interventional targets to HF treatment, with significant implications for public health and clinical practice.

Published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.