A Novel Coach-Approach to Clinical Faculty Mentoring and the UW Department of Medicine Clinical Faculty Development Program
Alstott, J. D.; Gent, C.; Bell, C. F.; Marlin, D. R.; Hernandez, A.; Schulman, E.; Gehl, S. L.; Schnapp, L. M.; Stein, J. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical faculty at academic health centers may benefit from specific mentorship and proficiencies that are distinct from those on research tracks. We describe the creation, activities, and one-year impact of a faculty development program that included novel professional coaching training (the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program, CFMP) which was supplemented by skills- and knowledge-building activities (the Clinical Faculty Development Series, CFDS). MethodsThe goals and components of the CFMP and CFDS are described in detail. A mixed methods evaluation plan guided collection of confidential survey and interview data before and after the first year of these activities. We used paired t-tests to identify statistically significant changes. ResultsThe 43 clinical mentors reported significant gains in job satisfaction, teaching attitudes, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence with coaching skills for mentorship (all p<0.05). Of mentor respondents, 88% found the coach approach to mentoring program to be "very" or "somewhat" helpful. Coaching behavioral domains with the greatest evidence of improvement were supporting the mentee to integrate new awareness, insight, learning into their worldview and behaviors (p=0.0503) and managing time and focus of mentoring sessions (p=0.022). All 37 mentees had at least one meeting with a mentor (100%). Over 9 months, 39 virtual CFDS sessions had an average participation of 38 participants (range 22-59). A majority of surveyed faculty (>55%) agreed or strongly agreed the CFDS sessions provided valuable opportunities for skills development with teaching, leadership, wellness, diversity, equity, inclusion, and promotion. ConclusionsAmong clinical mentors, our novel coach approach to clinical faculty mentoring and skill-building had favorable effects on job satisfaction, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence in coaching skills. Outcomes from the clinical faculty development series supported the mentoring program outcomes. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine how this program will impact mentees.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 96%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 95%
- Evaluating the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-related content in graduate medical education: a national survey of program directors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices 95%
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 93%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual Recruitment is Here to Stay: 2020 ID Fellowship Program and Matched Applicant Recruitment Experiences 96%
- High proportion of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals 1-6 months after illness and association with disease severity in an outpatient telemedicine population 89%
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 96%
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees 93%
- Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.