Navigating stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review
Menard, A.; Yang, M.; Oostlander, S.; Sarwal, K.; Manji, I.; O'Sullivan, T.; Fraser, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrevious viral outbreaks have highlighted implications for the management of complex health conditions. This study delves into the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke care, by examining evidence of shifts in healthcare utilization, the enduring effects on post-stroke recovery, and the overall quality of life experienced by stroke survivors. MethodsA scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Scoping Reviews. The search strategy encompassed electronic databases (APA PsycInfo, Embase, Medline, and CINAHL). English language articles published between December 2019 and January 2022 were included, focusing on individuals who experienced a stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data extraction involved identifying study characteristics and significant findings, facilitating a qualitative and narrative synthesis of the gathered evidence. ResultsSeven domain summaries were identified. They all described the aspects of systemic transformations in stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) patient behavior and awareness; (2) telemedicine and remote care; (3) delays in treatment; (4) impact on healthcare resources; (5) quality of care; (6) changes in stroke severity; and (7) reduction in stroke admissions. ConclusionsThis study underscored the critical need to encourage swift patient response to acute stroke symptoms, by finding new avenues for treatment, mitigating hospital-related infection fears, and advocating for the establishment of centralized stroke centers. These measures are integral to optimizing stroke care delivery and ensuring timely interventions, particularly in the challenging context of a pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 94%
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 94%
- Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a cohort during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 90%
- Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis 90%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of Mobile Stroke Units in England and Wales: a mixed methods study 94%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 93%
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.