Back

Comparative venom analysis between melanistic and normally-colored phenotypes of the common adder (Vipera berus)

Schulte, L.; Uhrig, L.; Eichberg, J.; Schwartze, M.; Auth, I.; Schulz, M.; Lindner, T.; Hien, P.; Hardes, K.; Vilcinskas, A.; Lueddecke, T.

2024-03-19 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.03.18.585504 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Snake venom is an ecologically-relevant functional trait directly linked with a snakes fitness and survival, facilitating predation and defense. Snake venom variation occurs at all taxonomic levels, but the study of variation at intraspecific level is still in its early stages. The common adder (Vipera berus) exhibits considerable variation in color phenotypes across its distribution range. Melanistic (fully black) individuals are the subject of myths and fairytales, and in German folklore such "hell adders" are considered more toxic than their normally-colored conspecifics. However, these claims have never been formally tested. Here, we provide the first comparative analysis of venoms from melanistic and normally-colored common adders. Specifically, we compared the venom profiles by SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC, and tested the protease, phospholipase A2 and cytotoxic activities of the venoms of both phenotypes. Phospholipase A2 activity was similar in both phenotypes, whereas general protease activity was higher in the melanistic venom, which was also more cytotoxic at two concentrations (6.25 and 12.5 {micro}g/ml). These minor differences between the venoms of melanistic and normally-colored adders are unlikely to be of clinical relevance in the context of human envenomation. In light of our results, the claim that melanistic adders produce more toxic venom than their normally-colored conspecifics appears rooted entirely in folklore.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.