Back

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hashimoto Thyroiditis Development Risk

de Oliveira Andrade, L. J.; Matos de Oliveira, G. C.; Matos de Oliveira, L. C.; Vinhaes Bittencourt, A. M.; Matos de Oliveira, L.

2024-03-16 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.03.15.24304346 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHashimotos Thyroiditis (HT) is a prevalent autoimmune disorder impacting thyroid function. Early detection allows for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on clinical presentation and antibody testing, lacking a robust risk prediction tool. ObjectiveTo develop a high-precision machine learning (ML) model for predicting the risk of HT development. MethodData patients were acquired from PubMed. A binary classifier was constructed through data pre-processing, feature selection, and exploration of various ML models. Hyperparameter optimization and performance evaluation metrics (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score) were employed. ResultsOut of a total of 9,173 individuals, 400 subjects within this cohort exhibited normal thyroid function, while 436 individuals were diagnosed with HT. The mean patient age was 45 years, and 90% were female. The best performing model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.87 and AUC-PR of 0.85, indicating high predictive accuracy. Additionally, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score reached 85%, 90%, 80%, and 83% respectively, demonstrating the models effectiveness in identifying individuals at risk of HT development. Hyperparameter tuning was optimized using a Random Search approach. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing ML for accurate prediction of HT risk. The high performance metrics achieved highlight the potential for this approach to become a valuable clinical tool for early identification and risk stratification of patients susceptible to HT.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.