Effects of long-term unmet needs and unmet rehabilitation needs on the quality of life in stroke survivors
Lee, Y.; Kim, W.-S.; Chang, W. K.; Jung, Y. S.; Jee, S.; Ko, S.-H.; Sohn, M. K.; Shin, Y.-I.; Bae, H.-J.; Kim, B. J.; Kim, J. Y.; Shin, D.-I.; Yum, K. S.; Chae, H.-Y.; Kim, D.-H.; Cha, J.-K.; Park, M.-S.; Kim, J.-T.; Choi, K.-H.; Kang, J.; Paik, N.-J.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnmet long-term needs and rehabilitation needs are prevalent among stroke survivors and affect their quality of life. We aimed to identify the long-term unmet needs and unmet rehabilitation needs among stroke survivors in South Korea and evaluate their intercorrelations with health-related quality of life. MethodsStroke survivors who were admitted to four Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Disease Centers between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 were telephonically surveyed using a computer-assisted telephone interview method. With the aim of surveying approximately 1,000 patients, 9,204 people were recruited through random sampling. Unmet needs were evaluated on the basis of Longer-term Unmet Needs after Stroke questionnaire items. Quality of life was evaluated using the EuroQoL 5-dimension, 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire and the EQ-5D index. ResultsAmong the participants, 93.6% experienced at least one unmet need and 311 (32.6%) reported unmet rehabilitation needs. The number of unmet needs, age, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and previous stroke showed significant negative correlations with the EQ-5D index (p-value < 0.05). The age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for reporting unmet rehabilitation needs significantly increased with problems in mobility (OR, 4.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.64-6.76), self-care (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 3.32-5.98), usual activities (OR, 5.78; 95% CI, 4.21-7.93), pain/discomfort (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.76-5.06), anxiety/depression (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.74-4.91), higher mRS score (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.29-4.28), prior hyperlipidemia (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00-1.81), and number of unmet needs (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.25-1.36). ConclusionsUnmet needs were prevalent among stroke survivors and were associated with a lower quality of life and increased odds of reporting unmet rehabilitation needs. Further research is needed to investigate strategies for addressing these subjective unmet needs with the aim of improving the long-term quality of life of stroke survivors.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 96%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiorespiratory exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity: results from a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 94%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 93%
- Domain-specific Cognitive Impairments, Mood and Quality of Life 6 Months After Stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship Between Participation In Daily Life Activities And Physical Activity In Stroke Survivors: A Protocol For A Systematic Review And Meta-Analyses-Based Data Synthesis 94%
- Evaluation of Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Models to Assess the Value of Stroke Genetic Liability for Prediction of Risk of Stroke within the UK Biobank 90%
- Hemispheric lateralization in older adults who habitually play darts: a cross-sectional study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.