Back

NeuralPlayground: A Standardised Environment for Evaluating Models of Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex

Domine, C. C. J.; Carrasco Davis, R. A.; Hollingsworth, L.; Sirmpilatze, N.; Tyson, A. L.; Jarvis, D.; Barry, C.; Saxe, A. M.

2024-03-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.06.583699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural processes in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex are thought to be crucial for spatial cognition. A growing variety of theoretical models have been proposed to capture the rich neural and behavioral phenomena associated with these circuits. However, systematic comparison of these theories, both against each other and against empirical data, remains challenging. To address this gap, we present NeuralPlayground, an open-source standardised software framework for comparisons between theory and experiment in the domain of spatial cognition. This Python software package offers a reproducible way to compare models against a centralised library of published experimental results, including neural recordings and animal behavior. The framework implements three Agents embodying different computational models; three Experiments comprising publicly available neural and behavioral datasets; a customisable 2-dimensional Arena (continuous and discrete) able to generate common and novel spatial layouts; and a Comparison tool that facilitates systematic comparisons between models and data. Each module can also be used separately, allowing standardised and flexible access to influential models and data sets. We hope NeuralPlayground, available on GitHub3, provides a starting point for a shared, standardized, open, and reproducible computational understanding of the role of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in spatial cognition.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.2%
3
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
9
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
11
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
Journal of Open Source Software
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%